That's what the story, "The Lavender Heart of Texas," in the current issue of Time Magazine says. Even more surprising to me, someone who still associates the city with the 1980's television show featuring oilman J. R. Ewing, the hot spot appears to be the Big D itself, Dallas.
Gays have played an important, less noticed role in Dallas' evolution. Over the past decade, a large and politically powerful lesbian and gay community has emerged. Both the Dallas sheriff and the county judge--an Old West title meaning chairman of the county commissioners--are openly gay. The district clerk is gay too, and Dallas is home to what is said to be the largest gay church in the world, the Cathedral of Hope, which has 3,500 members, a full choir, a violinist and long-stemmed roses in the bathroom. Dallas' fund-raising dinner for the Human Rights Campaign, the Washington-based gay group, is the largest in the nation, drawing 3,300 and raising more than $1 million for HRC and local gay organizations. And according to the gay group Lambda Legal, Dallas' is the only school district in Texas that includes teachers in its antidiscrimination policies.
So how gay is Dallas? Gay population figures are difficult to estimate because even accepting communities have a closet. But according to the Williams Institute, a gay think tank at UCLA, Dallas has the ninth largest concentration of same-sex couples in the nation. As the Dallas visitors bureau gurgles, "[Dallas] has left behind stereotypes of big-haired women and rowdy cowboys--that is, unless you count sassy drag queens and strapping gay rodeo champs."
This is not the Texas of the American imagination. Or is it? Ensorcelled by strivers and status, Dallas has always tried hard to be sophisticated. And the city knows a mathematical equation about American city life: urban sophistication requires gay civilization. Gays have gentrified once crumbling neighborhoods like Oak Lawn in Dallas; many gays have relocated to the city to work at companies like American Airlines that have a significant gay customer base.
Ironically, Dallas is believed to be the next destination for President Bush once his term is mercifully up, and that is also where his presidential library is expected to be built.
I wouldn't expect to see a rainbow flag flying from that building, but fortunately there are already plenty of GLBT friendly spots in a thriving gay community down there.
Click here to read the Time magazine article.
May 19, 2007
May 18, 2007
A Majority in U.S. Support GLBT Inclusion in Hate-Crimes Bill
From The Advocate:
A new Gallup poll indicates that a majority of Americans support the hate-crimes bill now before Congress.
"This new national poll continues to reiterate how incredibly out of touch right-wing organizations are with the will of the American people and underscores the need for the Senate to pass the bill," said Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese in a written statement.
"I hope President Bush will look at this poll and realize how unbelievably out of line a threatened veto of this critical crime-fighting piece of legislation is with a majority of Americans."
According to the HRC, when the poll was broken down by self-identified demographic subgroups, 60 percent of Republicans; 69 percent of independents and 75 percent of Democrats support passage of the hate-crimes bill.
Regular churchgoers' support of the bill was less strong than others, but even they polled 64 percent in support. Seventy-three percent of people who attend church seldom or never said they support the bill.
Here is a direct link to The Gallup Poll site so you can peruse the results youself.
A new Gallup poll indicates that a majority of Americans support the hate-crimes bill now before Congress.
"This new national poll continues to reiterate how incredibly out of touch right-wing organizations are with the will of the American people and underscores the need for the Senate to pass the bill," said Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese in a written statement.
"I hope President Bush will look at this poll and realize how unbelievably out of line a threatened veto of this critical crime-fighting piece of legislation is with a majority of Americans."
According to the HRC, when the poll was broken down by self-identified demographic subgroups, 60 percent of Republicans; 69 percent of independents and 75 percent of Democrats support passage of the hate-crimes bill.
Regular churchgoers' support of the bill was less strong than others, but even they polled 64 percent in support. Seventy-three percent of people who attend church seldom or never said they support the bill.
Here is a direct link to The Gallup Poll site so you can peruse the results youself.
Fred Phelps Tops Himself This Time
When you're a whack job like Fred Phelps and his family/congreation at Westboro Baptist Church, you've set the bar so low that you're the only one who could possibly lower it.
Amazingly, I believe they're getting ready to do just that.
According to the church's website, they plan on protesting outside Rev. Jerry Falwell's funeral next Tuesday. If you're like me, you probably find that surprising. I surmised they would have had more views in common than those on which they disagreed, but apparently Falwell wasn't quite stringent enough in his bigotry to satisfy the folks at Westboro:
On its Web site, Westboro says it will "preach" outside the funeral "of the corpulent false prophet Jerry Falwell, who spent his entire life prophesying lies and false doctrines like 'God loves everyone.'"
In attacking Falwell the church says he "warmly praised Christ-rejecting Jews, pedophile-condoning Catholics, money-grubbing compromisers, practicing fags like Mel White (of Souflorce), and backsliders like Billy Graham and Robert Schuler, etc."
We all should aspire to being a "backslider" like Billy Graham.
Here is a related story from the Fort-Worth (TX) Star-Telegram that tells the story of the funeral the Westboro cult skipped so they could get to Falwell's.
Amazingly, I believe they're getting ready to do just that.
According to the church's website, they plan on protesting outside Rev. Jerry Falwell's funeral next Tuesday. If you're like me, you probably find that surprising. I surmised they would have had more views in common than those on which they disagreed, but apparently Falwell wasn't quite stringent enough in his bigotry to satisfy the folks at Westboro:
On its Web site, Westboro says it will "preach" outside the funeral "of the corpulent false prophet Jerry Falwell, who spent his entire life prophesying lies and false doctrines like 'God loves everyone.'"
In attacking Falwell the church says he "warmly praised Christ-rejecting Jews, pedophile-condoning Catholics, money-grubbing compromisers, practicing fags like Mel White (of Souflorce), and backsliders like Billy Graham and Robert Schuler, etc."
We all should aspire to being a "backslider" like Billy Graham.
Here is a related story from the Fort-Worth (TX) Star-Telegram that tells the story of the funeral the Westboro cult skipped so they could get to Falwell's.
Dealing with Gay Youth Homelessness
From the New York Times:
One girl said she started living on the streets after her mother beat her for dressing like a boy. Another said she ran away from home after her father pulled a gun on her for hanging around with so many “tomboys.” A third said she left home after a family acquaintance raped her because she was a lesbian and he wanted to “straighten her out.”
But gathered at Ruth’s House, a 10-bed emergency shelter for gay homeless youths here in east Detroit, they all said that for the first time they felt safe.
Ruth’s House is one of a small number of shelters for gay youths that have opened around the nation in the past four years, reflecting an increasing awareness among child welfare advocates of the disproportionately high number of gay youths in the homeless population and the special problems they face.
Five years ago, such shelters were rare, but now there are more than 25 nationwide.
Many experts estimate that while gay men and lesbians make up 3 percent to 5 percent of the general population, more than 20 percent of homeless youths under age 21 in many urban areas are gay, according to recent surveys of street youths and shelter workers published in peer-reviewed academic journals, and a study released in January by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Coalition for the Homeless.
Once on the streets, advocates and researchers said, gay youths may be avoiding group homes, shelters and the foster care system because they are afraid they will face violence and harassment.
Some gay youths have said they were beaten in full view of shelter staff members who did nothing to help. Others said they were forced to wear distinctly colored jumpsuits so they could be identified easily in the shelter population.
Apparently there are homophobes among the homeless and those who work at shelters. Amazingly, there are places where GLBT people aren't even treated as equals to those without their own home.
Click here to read more from the New York Times article.
One girl said she started living on the streets after her mother beat her for dressing like a boy. Another said she ran away from home after her father pulled a gun on her for hanging around with so many “tomboys.” A third said she left home after a family acquaintance raped her because she was a lesbian and he wanted to “straighten her out.”
But gathered at Ruth’s House, a 10-bed emergency shelter for gay homeless youths here in east Detroit, they all said that for the first time they felt safe.
Ruth’s House is one of a small number of shelters for gay youths that have opened around the nation in the past four years, reflecting an increasing awareness among child welfare advocates of the disproportionately high number of gay youths in the homeless population and the special problems they face.
Five years ago, such shelters were rare, but now there are more than 25 nationwide.
Many experts estimate that while gay men and lesbians make up 3 percent to 5 percent of the general population, more than 20 percent of homeless youths under age 21 in many urban areas are gay, according to recent surveys of street youths and shelter workers published in peer-reviewed academic journals, and a study released in January by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Coalition for the Homeless.
Once on the streets, advocates and researchers said, gay youths may be avoiding group homes, shelters and the foster care system because they are afraid they will face violence and harassment.
Some gay youths have said they were beaten in full view of shelter staff members who did nothing to help. Others said they were forced to wear distinctly colored jumpsuits so they could be identified easily in the shelter population.
Apparently there are homophobes among the homeless and those who work at shelters. Amazingly, there are places where GLBT people aren't even treated as equals to those without their own home.
Click here to read more from the New York Times article.
May 17, 2007
Rev. Mel White Shed Tears For Falwell
You may not have known this, but while he was still in the closet, Rev. Mel White, one of the co-founders of Soulforce, was the ghose writer for "Falwell, An Autobiography," published in 1987. That gave him a unique perspective among GLBT advocates of the man who he calls "the face of homophobia." He shared some thoughts on Jerry Falwell's recent passing with The Advocate:
I knew there would be just a huge hole in Virginia and in Lynchburg, and I felt for those people. But at the same time I was feeling more strongly that now we’ll never have a chance for Jerry Falwell to say, “I was wrong. I did wrong, and I said wrong, and I’m sorry. God creates gay people and loves them just like she created them. I’m not going to say anything more against gay people because I was wrong.” Imagine the consequence that would have had for so many people.
As far as the future of the religious right, Liberty University will graduate 3,750 little Falwells this month. Liberty will have a school with more students than UC Berkeley or UCLA within 20 years. That’s the kind of foothold Falwell has on education. He’s got an accredited law school, like Pat Robertson’s Regent University. They’re both turning out lawyers who are wiggling their way into politics and government. An entire generation is coming up that really loves Falwell, and I’m afraid they're all going to be antigay. We gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are really missing it when we think the older generation will pass and the newer generation will save us. A whole new generation of people is being prepared to condemn us.
Click here to read about Rev. White's relationship with Falwell and more of his thoughts on the religious right.
I knew there would be just a huge hole in Virginia and in Lynchburg, and I felt for those people. But at the same time I was feeling more strongly that now we’ll never have a chance for Jerry Falwell to say, “I was wrong. I did wrong, and I said wrong, and I’m sorry. God creates gay people and loves them just like she created them. I’m not going to say anything more against gay people because I was wrong.” Imagine the consequence that would have had for so many people.
As far as the future of the religious right, Liberty University will graduate 3,750 little Falwells this month. Liberty will have a school with more students than UC Berkeley or UCLA within 20 years. That’s the kind of foothold Falwell has on education. He’s got an accredited law school, like Pat Robertson’s Regent University. They’re both turning out lawyers who are wiggling their way into politics and government. An entire generation is coming up that really loves Falwell, and I’m afraid they're all going to be antigay. We gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people are really missing it when we think the older generation will pass and the newer generation will save us. A whole new generation of people is being prepared to condemn us.
Click here to read about Rev. White's relationship with Falwell and more of his thoughts on the religious right.
Same-Sex Marriage Opponents Don't Want "Gay Cooties"
Yes, I said gay cooties. It's not an original phrase, though. I found it in this editorial from the Pawtucket (RI) Times. Titled "Opponents of same-sex marriage display bigotry," the editorial does a good job of backing up that claim:
Anti-gay prejudice is the only reason that the law will not allow same-sex marriage. The opponents, for many of whom religion is either a reason or an excuse, don't want to get gay cooties all over "their" sacred institution. What else does a so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) - which essentially defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman - defend marriage against?
That position is childish. Not child-like, with its implication of innocence, wonder and acceptance, but childish, as in selfish, petty and small-minded.
In many ways, including its connection to religion, the gay marriage issue is like the abortion debate - there is no room for compromise. No middle ground. Just about everybody's mind is made up, and those opinions are polarized. Unless you are the guy who stands up and says, "how about civil unions?" In which case you get the hairy eyeball from BOTH sides.
Gays resent civil union because it is half-a-civil-rights-loaf. It still makes them "other" and "less than," even though to a smaller degree. And it will not effectively confer many of the rights and privileges of marriage, particularly on the federal level, that they are looking for and deserve. The opponents, on the other hand, don't want it "because...because...well, because they're a bunch of queers. That's why, dammit." I don't want to imply that religion equates with anti-gay bigotry. To the contrary, there were several clergymen, some wearing clerical garb, testifying in favor of the same-sex marriage bill. One provided a list of approximately 100 clergy from churches all over the state endorsing the bill.
There's plenty more I didn't excerpt here. I recommend checking out the entire editorial. Be ready to laugh, and then probably nod your head in agreement.
Anti-gay prejudice is the only reason that the law will not allow same-sex marriage. The opponents, for many of whom religion is either a reason or an excuse, don't want to get gay cooties all over "their" sacred institution. What else does a so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) - which essentially defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman - defend marriage against?
That position is childish. Not child-like, with its implication of innocence, wonder and acceptance, but childish, as in selfish, petty and small-minded.
In many ways, including its connection to religion, the gay marriage issue is like the abortion debate - there is no room for compromise. No middle ground. Just about everybody's mind is made up, and those opinions are polarized. Unless you are the guy who stands up and says, "how about civil unions?" In which case you get the hairy eyeball from BOTH sides.
Gays resent civil union because it is half-a-civil-rights-loaf. It still makes them "other" and "less than," even though to a smaller degree. And it will not effectively confer many of the rights and privileges of marriage, particularly on the federal level, that they are looking for and deserve. The opponents, on the other hand, don't want it "because...because...well, because they're a bunch of queers. That's why, dammit." I don't want to imply that religion equates with anti-gay bigotry. To the contrary, there were several clergymen, some wearing clerical garb, testifying in favor of the same-sex marriage bill. One provided a list of approximately 100 clergy from churches all over the state endorsing the bill.
There's plenty more I didn't excerpt here. I recommend checking out the entire editorial. Be ready to laugh, and then probably nod your head in agreement.
May 16, 2007
Former President Carter Supports End of "Dont' Ask, Don't Tell"
Showing in yet another way he is an outstanding ex-president, Jimmy Carter has spoken out against the U. S. Military's policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" regarding gays in active service. From Billerico, quoting Carter:
"It is my long-held belief that every human being deserves dignity and respect. I often heard that phrase during my years at the United States Naval Academy, I carried it out as Commander-in-Chief, and it continues to animate my human rights work around the globe today. The nation's commitment to human rights requires that lawmakers revisit 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' the current policy that prevents lesbians, gays and bisexuals from serving openly in our armed forces.
"...there are great differences in public opinion on social issues today compared to twenty years ago. When I served as President, the majority in our country did not support equality for gay Americans, but that has now changed.
"The estimated 65,000 gay men and women who currently are serving our country honorably deserve respect. America has always been a beacon of hope for those who believe in human rights and individual dignity. The brave and dedicated men and women of our armed forces also must benefit from this fundamental ideal."
Dignity, respect, and ideals; what a concept!
"It is my long-held belief that every human being deserves dignity and respect. I often heard that phrase during my years at the United States Naval Academy, I carried it out as Commander-in-Chief, and it continues to animate my human rights work around the globe today. The nation's commitment to human rights requires that lawmakers revisit 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' the current policy that prevents lesbians, gays and bisexuals from serving openly in our armed forces.
"...there are great differences in public opinion on social issues today compared to twenty years ago. When I served as President, the majority in our country did not support equality for gay Americans, but that has now changed.
"The estimated 65,000 gay men and women who currently are serving our country honorably deserve respect. America has always been a beacon of hope for those who believe in human rights and individual dignity. The brave and dedicated men and women of our armed forces also must benefit from this fundamental ideal."
Dignity, respect, and ideals; what a concept!
An Honest Reaction to Falwell's Death
Posted from Street Prophets:
Tyranny is truly successful when the oppressors so warp the oppressed that the latter does the former's work for them. Internalized homophobia is a prime example, and in the end is nothing more than induced self-hatred.
Mr. Falwell heaped abuse upon GLBT folk, going so far as to blame us for 9/11. There are may queer folk still so convinced of their own worthlessness that at some level, they believe this heinous lie and all the others, too, that we're abominable in God's eyes.
Healing from abuse and its consequent self-hatred begins with the excruciatingly painful awareness that yes, the abuse was / is REAL, and that one does indeed hate oneself. The next step is raging fury - ugly, but necessary - at the abuser(s) who well deserve it.
So there are many today who are gleeful that Falwell is dead; I am one of them. It's a shocking thing to behold, but required for healing. The trick to moving past this hatred is to know in one's heart that there is yet more growth, and that peace / release from pain can indeed be won.
So rather than vilifying those of us who dance on Falwell's grave as part of the cost of healing from wounds he helped inflict, please consider praying for us instead, that we might step deeper into grace and finally into forgiveness, of ourselves, and ultimately of Jerry.
I personally appreciate the raw honesty expressed here and will gladly honor the request to pray for grace and forgiveness. I'm sure there are a lot of people who had similar reactions to Falwell's passing, and hopefully this piece can encourage them to look deep inside and start dealing with the pain that lies directly below it.
Tyranny is truly successful when the oppressors so warp the oppressed that the latter does the former's work for them. Internalized homophobia is a prime example, and in the end is nothing more than induced self-hatred.
Mr. Falwell heaped abuse upon GLBT folk, going so far as to blame us for 9/11. There are may queer folk still so convinced of their own worthlessness that at some level, they believe this heinous lie and all the others, too, that we're abominable in God's eyes.
Healing from abuse and its consequent self-hatred begins with the excruciatingly painful awareness that yes, the abuse was / is REAL, and that one does indeed hate oneself. The next step is raging fury - ugly, but necessary - at the abuser(s) who well deserve it.
So there are many today who are gleeful that Falwell is dead; I am one of them. It's a shocking thing to behold, but required for healing. The trick to moving past this hatred is to know in one's heart that there is yet more growth, and that peace / release from pain can indeed be won.
So rather than vilifying those of us who dance on Falwell's grave as part of the cost of healing from wounds he helped inflict, please consider praying for us instead, that we might step deeper into grace and finally into forgiveness, of ourselves, and ultimately of Jerry.
I personally appreciate the raw honesty expressed here and will gladly honor the request to pray for grace and forgiveness. I'm sure there are a lot of people who had similar reactions to Falwell's passing, and hopefully this piece can encourage them to look deep inside and start dealing with the pain that lies directly below it.
May 15, 2007
Thoughts Around the Nation on the Passing of Rev. Jerry Falwell
Today, Rev. Jerry Falwell, the founder of the Moral Majority, founder and Chancellor of Liberty University, one of the leaders of the religious right, and one of the staunchest opponents of GLBT rights and acceptance in society, has died at the age of 73.
Here are some samples of recations to his death and life. I've balanced the different viewpoints because I feel when someone of importance passes on, he deserves the whole of his life to be viewed, not just one aspect no matter how abhorent that part might be. I'll share a few thoughts of my own at the end.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State executive director Rev. Barry W. Lynn:
“Jerry Falwell politicized religion and failed to understand the genius of our Constitution, but there is no denying his impact on American political life. He will long be remembered as the face and voice of the Religious Right."
“Americans United extends its condolences to members of Dr. Falwell’s family, the congregants of Thomas Road Baptist Church and the students and staff of Liberty University.”
Exodous International (Ex-Gay ministry) President Alan Chambers:
“Rev. Falwell will be remembered for his consistent emphasis on the truth that Jesus Christ loves and offers salvation to every individual regardless of their past. No doubt, many have come to a personal relationship with Christ through his ministry. Our thoughts and prayers are with Rev. Falwell’s wife, Macel, their three children and his friends and colleagues in Lynchburg, Virginia.”
Soulforce (GLBT advocacy):
Today, the staff and board of directors of Soulforce observe the passing of Rev. Jerry Falwell and offer our sincere condolences to his family, the members of Thomas Road Baptist Church, and the students at Liberty University.
"While Soulforce has a long history of nonviolent direct action at Jerry Falwell Ministries, our adversary was never Jerry Falwell, but rather the misinformation about lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people espoused by Falwell and so many others," said Soulforce Executive Director Jeff Lutes.
Upon hearing the news of Rev. Falwell's death, Rev. Dr. Mel White said "It breaks my heart to think that Jerry died without ever discovering the truth about God's lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender children. I sincerely hope that one day his school and his church will have a change of heart."
Don Wildmon, Chairman, American Family Association:
Wildmon says Falwell was passionate about serving the Lord. "His life is reflective of what can happen to a person who commits himself to the Lord and keeps going straight ahead and never looks back from the plow," says the ministry leader. "He will be missed."
Falwell would want Christians to stay active in the culture war, adds Wildmon.
Truth Wins Out Executive Director Wayne Besen:
“It is with great regret that Rev. Jerry Falwell never moderated his position on homosexuality,” said Truth Wins Out’s Executive Director Wayne Besen. “While our hearts go out to his family, we can’t help but to reflect on his life and think about all of the families he’s torn apart and teenagers that committed suicide because he made them feel inferior. He never missed an opportunity to kick our better angels to the curb and capitalize on our lesser demons to advance his career.”
Liberty Counsel, the legal activist arm of Falwell's organization:
Rev. Falwell loved God and he loved people. His convictions in biblical principles were matched by the depth of his compassion for people. He made you feel like you were the most important person in a room, even though it was filled with dignitaries. He cared for each person and he loved the students at Liberty University.
We have never known a man who had so many important obligations and commitments and yet who always had time for people. As pastor of a mega-church with a myriad of ministries, too many to mention, Chancellor of the world's largest evangelical university, founder of several national parachurch ministries, husband, father and grandfather, he always took time to stop and greet people with a genuine smile, a firm handshake (or sometimes a friendly punch in the rib cage) and a deep voice filled with wisdom and uncanny insight.
Rev. Falwell's legacy will live on in the millions of people he touched, and his vision will carry on through his family and the graduates of Liberty University. While we are missing a beloved pastor, leader and friend, his family is missing a beloved husband, father and grandfather. Our prayers are with his wife, Macel, his children, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Jonathan Falwell, and Jeannie Falwell Savas, and his grandchildren.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Matt Foreman:
“The death of a family member or friend is always a sad occasion and we express our condolences to all those who were close to the Rev. Jerry Falwell. Unfortunately, we will always remember him as a founder and leader of America’s anti-gay industry, someone who exacerbated the nation’s appalling response to the onslaught of the AIDS epidemic, someone who demonized and vilified us for political gain and someone who used religion to divide rather than unite our nation.”
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins:
He was a pioneer whose legacy, marked by courage and candor, blazed the trail for all men and women of conviction to engage--boldly--on the great questions of our day. But he was first and foremost a husband, a father and a pastor. Our prayers today are with the Falwell family, in particular his wife Macel, his children, his grandchildren and the congregation of the Thomas Road Baptist Church.
Triangle Foundation (Michigan) Executive Director Jeffrey Montgomery:
"Our condolences go out to Rev. Falwell's family. Whether the family is straight or gay, the passage of a loved one is always a challenging and difficult time."
"In the wake of Rev. Falwell's passing, it is our strong hope that his followers transform their misunderstanding and attitudes regarding their gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender brothers and sisters. It is a sad thing that Rev. Falwell spent so much of his time and energy while alive as a leading voice in the struggle against LGBT civil rights. We can only hope that the death of such an anti-gay voice will eventually lead to a healing of the fear and hostility against us that Rev. Falwell actively promoted."
Focus on the Family Chairman Dr. James Dobson:
"Our hearts and prayers go out to Jerry’s wife Macel, his children Jerry, Jonathan and Jeannie, and his church. This is a tragic loss for them – and for all Americans. Jerry’s passions and convictions changed the course of our country for the better over the last 20 years – and I was proud to call him my friend."
"Because Jerry, and his Moral Majority, were the first ones out of the trenches in the culture war, they got shot at repeatedly by the national media and by liberal church leaders. But he always weathered the onslaught, permanently stamping the conservative American church with respectability on social action.
"It was my honor to share the front lines with him in the battle for righteousness in our nation. We will continue that fight, in his honor, until our mutual goals are achieved."
Sojourners President and Executive Director Jim Wallis:
I was saddened to learn that Rev. Jerry Falwell passed away this morning at age 73. Rev. Falwell and I have met many times over the years, as the media often paired us as debate partners on issues of faith and politics. I respected his passionate commitment to his beliefs, and our shared commitment to bring moral debate to the public square, although we didn’t agree on many things. At this time, however, what matters most is our prayers for comfort and peace for his family and friends.
CBN's Pat Robertson:
My wife and I have sent our condolences to Macel Falwell and her family. Jerry has been a tower of strength on many of the moral issues which have confronted our nation. Liberty University is a magnificent accomplishment and will prove a lasting legacy. Jerry’s courage and strength of convictions will be sadly missed in this time of increasing moral relativism. I join with the tens of thousands of his friends to mourn the passing of this extraordinary human being.
I have written extensively here about the late Dr. Falwell and his efforts to shove GLBT people back into the closet and prevent them from obtaining equality in any aspect of our society and see no need to put together a summary of my issues with his views today. As you can see by some of the comments from GLBT activists, the anger against Falwell ran so deep it spilled out even on the day he died. You can also see from the comments of religious right leaders like James Dobson that any day is a good day to campaign for your agenda, even using the death of someone you call a friend to do so.
I join those who offer their condolences and prayers to those who lost a husband, father, grandfather, pastor, and chancellor today. I also offer up a prayer that those who fill the leadership voids created by Falwell's passing take more of a New Testament view and focus on the love and acceptance that Jesus taught instead of Old Testament judgmentalism.
Here are some samples of recations to his death and life. I've balanced the different viewpoints because I feel when someone of importance passes on, he deserves the whole of his life to be viewed, not just one aspect no matter how abhorent that part might be. I'll share a few thoughts of my own at the end.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State executive director Rev. Barry W. Lynn:
“Jerry Falwell politicized religion and failed to understand the genius of our Constitution, but there is no denying his impact on American political life. He will long be remembered as the face and voice of the Religious Right."
“Americans United extends its condolences to members of Dr. Falwell’s family, the congregants of Thomas Road Baptist Church and the students and staff of Liberty University.”
Exodous International (Ex-Gay ministry) President Alan Chambers:
“Rev. Falwell will be remembered for his consistent emphasis on the truth that Jesus Christ loves and offers salvation to every individual regardless of their past. No doubt, many have come to a personal relationship with Christ through his ministry. Our thoughts and prayers are with Rev. Falwell’s wife, Macel, their three children and his friends and colleagues in Lynchburg, Virginia.”
Soulforce (GLBT advocacy):
Today, the staff and board of directors of Soulforce observe the passing of Rev. Jerry Falwell and offer our sincere condolences to his family, the members of Thomas Road Baptist Church, and the students at Liberty University.
"While Soulforce has a long history of nonviolent direct action at Jerry Falwell Ministries, our adversary was never Jerry Falwell, but rather the misinformation about lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people espoused by Falwell and so many others," said Soulforce Executive Director Jeff Lutes.
Upon hearing the news of Rev. Falwell's death, Rev. Dr. Mel White said "It breaks my heart to think that Jerry died without ever discovering the truth about God's lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender children. I sincerely hope that one day his school and his church will have a change of heart."
Don Wildmon, Chairman, American Family Association:
Wildmon says Falwell was passionate about serving the Lord. "His life is reflective of what can happen to a person who commits himself to the Lord and keeps going straight ahead and never looks back from the plow," says the ministry leader. "He will be missed."
Falwell would want Christians to stay active in the culture war, adds Wildmon.
Truth Wins Out Executive Director Wayne Besen:
“It is with great regret that Rev. Jerry Falwell never moderated his position on homosexuality,” said Truth Wins Out’s Executive Director Wayne Besen. “While our hearts go out to his family, we can’t help but to reflect on his life and think about all of the families he’s torn apart and teenagers that committed suicide because he made them feel inferior. He never missed an opportunity to kick our better angels to the curb and capitalize on our lesser demons to advance his career.”
Liberty Counsel, the legal activist arm of Falwell's organization:
Rev. Falwell loved God and he loved people. His convictions in biblical principles were matched by the depth of his compassion for people. He made you feel like you were the most important person in a room, even though it was filled with dignitaries. He cared for each person and he loved the students at Liberty University.
We have never known a man who had so many important obligations and commitments and yet who always had time for people. As pastor of a mega-church with a myriad of ministries, too many to mention, Chancellor of the world's largest evangelical university, founder of several national parachurch ministries, husband, father and grandfather, he always took time to stop and greet people with a genuine smile, a firm handshake (or sometimes a friendly punch in the rib cage) and a deep voice filled with wisdom and uncanny insight.
Rev. Falwell's legacy will live on in the millions of people he touched, and his vision will carry on through his family and the graduates of Liberty University. While we are missing a beloved pastor, leader and friend, his family is missing a beloved husband, father and grandfather. Our prayers are with his wife, Macel, his children, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Jonathan Falwell, and Jeannie Falwell Savas, and his grandchildren.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Matt Foreman:
“The death of a family member or friend is always a sad occasion and we express our condolences to all those who were close to the Rev. Jerry Falwell. Unfortunately, we will always remember him as a founder and leader of America’s anti-gay industry, someone who exacerbated the nation’s appalling response to the onslaught of the AIDS epidemic, someone who demonized and vilified us for political gain and someone who used religion to divide rather than unite our nation.”
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins:
He was a pioneer whose legacy, marked by courage and candor, blazed the trail for all men and women of conviction to engage--boldly--on the great questions of our day. But he was first and foremost a husband, a father and a pastor. Our prayers today are with the Falwell family, in particular his wife Macel, his children, his grandchildren and the congregation of the Thomas Road Baptist Church.
Triangle Foundation (Michigan) Executive Director Jeffrey Montgomery:
"Our condolences go out to Rev. Falwell's family. Whether the family is straight or gay, the passage of a loved one is always a challenging and difficult time."
"In the wake of Rev. Falwell's passing, it is our strong hope that his followers transform their misunderstanding and attitudes regarding their gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender brothers and sisters. It is a sad thing that Rev. Falwell spent so much of his time and energy while alive as a leading voice in the struggle against LGBT civil rights. We can only hope that the death of such an anti-gay voice will eventually lead to a healing of the fear and hostility against us that Rev. Falwell actively promoted."
Focus on the Family Chairman Dr. James Dobson:
"Our hearts and prayers go out to Jerry’s wife Macel, his children Jerry, Jonathan and Jeannie, and his church. This is a tragic loss for them – and for all Americans. Jerry’s passions and convictions changed the course of our country for the better over the last 20 years – and I was proud to call him my friend."
"Because Jerry, and his Moral Majority, were the first ones out of the trenches in the culture war, they got shot at repeatedly by the national media and by liberal church leaders. But he always weathered the onslaught, permanently stamping the conservative American church with respectability on social action.
"It was my honor to share the front lines with him in the battle for righteousness in our nation. We will continue that fight, in his honor, until our mutual goals are achieved."
Sojourners President and Executive Director Jim Wallis:
I was saddened to learn that Rev. Jerry Falwell passed away this morning at age 73. Rev. Falwell and I have met many times over the years, as the media often paired us as debate partners on issues of faith and politics. I respected his passionate commitment to his beliefs, and our shared commitment to bring moral debate to the public square, although we didn’t agree on many things. At this time, however, what matters most is our prayers for comfort and peace for his family and friends.
CBN's Pat Robertson:
My wife and I have sent our condolences to Macel Falwell and her family. Jerry has been a tower of strength on many of the moral issues which have confronted our nation. Liberty University is a magnificent accomplishment and will prove a lasting legacy. Jerry’s courage and strength of convictions will be sadly missed in this time of increasing moral relativism. I join with the tens of thousands of his friends to mourn the passing of this extraordinary human being.
I have written extensively here about the late Dr. Falwell and his efforts to shove GLBT people back into the closet and prevent them from obtaining equality in any aspect of our society and see no need to put together a summary of my issues with his views today. As you can see by some of the comments from GLBT activists, the anger against Falwell ran so deep it spilled out even on the day he died. You can also see from the comments of religious right leaders like James Dobson that any day is a good day to campaign for your agenda, even using the death of someone you call a friend to do so.
I join those who offer their condolences and prayers to those who lost a husband, father, grandfather, pastor, and chancellor today. I also offer up a prayer that those who fill the leadership voids created by Falwell's passing take more of a New Testament view and focus on the love and acceptance that Jesus taught instead of Old Testament judgmentalism.
Open House Sunday at BCF
I'm happy to announce that my church, Believers Covenant Fellowship, is holding an open house this Sunday, May 20 at our new facility from 2-5 PM with a brief dedication service at 3:30.
Although fairly small in number, our congreation stood strong in faith while the Lord led us through logistical and financial obstacles to see our building renovation through to completion. We are very proud of the work He has done through us to establish a warm, welcoming place to worship, study, and fellowship.
If you live in the Northern Virginia area and are seeking an open and affirming Christian church, or you're just curious to see what I've been writing about for nearly two years, I invite you to join us. Check out our website at the link above for directions or more information.
Although fairly small in number, our congreation stood strong in faith while the Lord led us through logistical and financial obstacles to see our building renovation through to completion. We are very proud of the work He has done through us to establish a warm, welcoming place to worship, study, and fellowship.
If you live in the Northern Virginia area and are seeking an open and affirming Christian church, or you're just curious to see what I've been writing about for nearly two years, I invite you to join us. Check out our website at the link above for directions or more information.
May 14, 2007
Newsweek Cover Story: "Rethinking Gender"
I use the acronym "GLBT" here frequently, which most of you know stands for "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender." I don't write a lot about transgender issues because, quite honestly, I don't understand a whole lot about them beyond the fact that they are people too and deserve the same rights I enjoy and often take for granted.
In their newest issue, Newsweek delves into the issue of gender in some depth. The cover story is titled, "Rethinking Gender," which goes into some of the basics about transgender issues, defining them and going through some of the different stages of the different situations.
Beyond that interesting article, Newsweek also features these pieces this week:
"Making a Difference," a former male Air Force sergeant running for office in Colorado.
"I Had To Fix My Life" a former male NASCAR driver is now a woman trying to get back behind the wheel competitively, with little success so far.
"None of Us Are Safe," actor Alexis Arquette on the politics of gender in America.
"It Stuns Me," sportswriter Christine Daniels on her transition. I wrote about here recently, the writer from the LA Times.
"No Big Deal," a corporate vice-president talks about how big companies are leading the way in helping transgender social reform.
There will also be an online chat on the Newsweek website on Wednesday at noon, EST.
There's a lot of information and insight in these articles (some of them are exclusive to the web site) and I find it very encouraging that one of the major mainstream news publications has devoted so much space and energy to helping people understand about transgender issues.
In their newest issue, Newsweek delves into the issue of gender in some depth. The cover story is titled, "Rethinking Gender," which goes into some of the basics about transgender issues, defining them and going through some of the different stages of the different situations.
Beyond that interesting article, Newsweek also features these pieces this week:
"Making a Difference," a former male Air Force sergeant running for office in Colorado.
"I Had To Fix My Life" a former male NASCAR driver is now a woman trying to get back behind the wheel competitively, with little success so far.
"None of Us Are Safe," actor Alexis Arquette on the politics of gender in America.
"It Stuns Me," sportswriter Christine Daniels on her transition. I wrote about here recently, the writer from the LA Times.
"No Big Deal," a corporate vice-president talks about how big companies are leading the way in helping transgender social reform.
There will also be an online chat on the Newsweek website on Wednesday at noon, EST.
There's a lot of information and insight in these articles (some of them are exclusive to the web site) and I find it very encouraging that one of the major mainstream news publications has devoted so much space and energy to helping people understand about transgender issues.
A Loving Family Has Everything a Child Needs
That's the conclusion reached by Peggy Drexler, a gender scholar at Stanford University who has studied the issue of same-sex parent adoptions in great depth. She writes about it in this Huffington Post column:
It's the family, stupid!
Of all the political statements in the current surge of political statements, my favorite has to be from New York's Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer on his plans to introduce legislation that would legalize same sex marriage."We will not ask whether this proposition of legalizing same-sex marriage is popular or unpopular," he said.
"We will not ask if it's hard or easy. We will simply ask if it is right or wrong."
That's exactly the right question.
When you are part of the thicket of legalities and political calculations, what you find is a family. And when that family has taken full responsibility for a child's sense of well being and belonging, lawyerly debate and political maneuvering seem absurdly beside the point.
The U.S. Census shows that almost 30 percent of same-sex couples in this nation have a child under 18 living with them in their home. You'll find same-sex couples raising children in 96 percent of all of the 3,141 counties in the U.S.
All evidence from studies of these families points clearly to the same conclusion: good parents and the kids they produce have nothing to do with being straight or gay. It has everything to do with care, affection and involvement.
For the children of same-sex marriages, that sense of their place in the world is greatly influenced by the current laws that say: There are real families. And then there is your family."
Ms. Drexler gets it. Families are put together by love, not blood.
It's the family, stupid!
Of all the political statements in the current surge of political statements, my favorite has to be from New York's Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer on his plans to introduce legislation that would legalize same sex marriage."We will not ask whether this proposition of legalizing same-sex marriage is popular or unpopular," he said.
"We will not ask if it's hard or easy. We will simply ask if it is right or wrong."
That's exactly the right question.
When you are part of the thicket of legalities and political calculations, what you find is a family. And when that family has taken full responsibility for a child's sense of well being and belonging, lawyerly debate and political maneuvering seem absurdly beside the point.
The U.S. Census shows that almost 30 percent of same-sex couples in this nation have a child under 18 living with them in their home. You'll find same-sex couples raising children in 96 percent of all of the 3,141 counties in the U.S.
All evidence from studies of these families points clearly to the same conclusion: good parents and the kids they produce have nothing to do with being straight or gay. It has everything to do with care, affection and involvement.
For the children of same-sex marriages, that sense of their place in the world is greatly influenced by the current laws that say: There are real families. And then there is your family."
Ms. Drexler gets it. Families are put together by love, not blood.
May 13, 2007
Book Review: "Calling The Rainbow Nation Home"
As I read more books about homosexuality and Christianity, I have seen two primary methods of telling stories and teaching views of God’s word. Writers generally emphasize experiences along their own personal, and often bumpy, walk with the Lord, or they take a more scholarly approach in reviewing and explaining scripture.
In her book “Calling The Rainbow Nation Home” (2005, iUniverse, 200 pages), Elaine Sundby does an excellent job of mixing both methods. First, Rev. Sundby, the founder of Faith Full Gospel Church and www.gaychurch.org, writes about her struggle with accepting the fact she was a lesbian. In the second half of the book, she explains how she reconciled that with her Christianity in a way that encourages other GLBT people to walk similar steps and reach the same destination.
During a difficult childhood, Rev. Sundby had a “come to Jesus” moment as a teenager, but that did not instantly turn her life around because she was still a girl living in a negative situation. Gradually, as she moved away from home and went to college, she began to find out who she was. Despite struggling scholastically in high school, she plowed her way through college and discovered that God had given her athletic gifts. She was coached in how to throw the javelin and became one of the best in the country and also won a national championship as a softball player.
During this time, she also began to understand that she was attracted to women. As with so many young Christians, it was drilled into her head that homosexuality was a deep, dark sin and a desire that could NEVER be acted upon. Rev. Sundby poured over her Bible and spent hour after hour in prayer asking for God to reveal His will to her. The answer came suddenly and clearly:
…..the Holy Spirit asked me a simple question: “Elaine, how is someone saved?”
“What?” I replied, “That’s not what I’m asking.”
Not to be deterred, the Holy Spirit gently asked again: “How are you saved?” At that moment, the famous passage in Scripture came to mind:
John 3:16 (NIV): For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
The simplicity of the truth hit me. I had been asking the wrong question. The issue was not sin, but salvation! God had told us that “whosoever” (King James translation) believes in his son would not perish. “Whosoever” did not exclude anyone; instead, it included everyone. There was simply no group of people who would—or could—be excluded from accepting God’s salvation.
For Rev. Sundby, that resolved part one of a two-part issue. She was now clear that she would not be sentenced to Hell for being a lesbian, but would she be sinning if she allowed herself to develop a relationship with the woman she was strongly attracted to? Were homosexual relationships by their very nature a sin? Here’s how she answered that question.
It depends is my answer. Being gay or straight has nothing to do with it. The issue is really about the quality of the relationship we have with God, with others, and with ourselves. God simply asks us: “Is your relationship based on, and operating in, My love or not? Does it encourage both people to spiritually grow and deepen their union with God? Is it loving and healthy for both parties?” If your relationship encourages and enhances these things, then it most assuredly is not a sin.
Having that resolved, Rev. Sundby allowed herself to embrace the love of her life, Pam, and they are still happily together. She also answered the call to ministry and became the founding pastor at Faith Full Gospel Fellowship in San Leandro, California. She moved forward with Pam with this foundation:
God and sin simply cannot coexist together: it is impossible.
2 Corinthians 6:14 (NIV): For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
Therefore, my personal conclusions about what sin was, and was not, really didn’t matter. If being with Pam was a sin, it would cause a separation between God and me.
I found this a particularly important section where Rev. Sundby explains her understanding of why GLBT people are ostracized by so many Christians.
Fear is not from the Lord; it operates in Satan’s kingdom (1 John 4:18; Rom. 8:15), yet we build complete belief systems around our fears and prejudices, and people fight change. There is no getting around the fact that it’s far easier to understand how one can be gay and Christian when one is gay and Christian.
I have also found it common for those who consider homosexuality an “abomination” to “prove” their cause by quoting every Scripture they can find pertaining to sexual sin and promiscuity. It is important to understand that Christians in the gay community are also adamantly against sexual sin. The difference lies in the fact that we do not believe God has singled out any particular community or nation of people as “evil” or “sinful,” believing instead that God’s edicts are applied without prejudice to all people and communities—homosexual and heterosexual alike.
Rev. Sundby also wrote a section titled “Remain in the State in which You Were Called.”
Like the Gentiles before us, God has never asked us to change who we are in order to receive his salvation or the spiritual gifts.
1 Corinthians 7:24 (Amplified): “So, brethren, in whatever station or state or condition of life each one was when he was called, there let him continue with and close to God.
In closing, Rev. Sundby has a message for how GLBT Christians needed to move forward:
Our priorities seem reversed at times. We seek first for acceptance, and then for fellowship. The problem is that protesting, picketing, and attacks through the press only serve to drive the two parties further apart. This is not the witness Christ wants us to be demonstrating to the world. Our humanism is on display rather than the character of Christ.
…..We need to focus first on reaching out to the lost within our own communities and then on building relationships with others within the Christian community. The best witness they have that God has accepted homosexuals—is us! But there can be no witness if there is no relationship.
I often criticize leaders from the religious right for trying to force their will on legislators and even as amendments to the United States Constitution. While I encourage GLBT advocacy in the public square, the approach Rev. Sundby is also very important and, I believe, severely under-utilized.
“Calling the Rainbow Nation Home” is a wonderful book that I highly recommend to all GLBT people and heterosexuals who are interested in understanding the difficult path a gay person has to walk to reach God, and how to reconcile that with what they have been previously been taught about the sinfulness of homosexuality.
In her book “Calling The Rainbow Nation Home” (2005, iUniverse, 200 pages), Elaine Sundby does an excellent job of mixing both methods. First, Rev. Sundby, the founder of Faith Full Gospel Church and www.gaychurch.org, writes about her struggle with accepting the fact she was a lesbian. In the second half of the book, she explains how she reconciled that with her Christianity in a way that encourages other GLBT people to walk similar steps and reach the same destination.
During a difficult childhood, Rev. Sundby had a “come to Jesus” moment as a teenager, but that did not instantly turn her life around because she was still a girl living in a negative situation. Gradually, as she moved away from home and went to college, she began to find out who she was. Despite struggling scholastically in high school, she plowed her way through college and discovered that God had given her athletic gifts. She was coached in how to throw the javelin and became one of the best in the country and also won a national championship as a softball player.
During this time, she also began to understand that she was attracted to women. As with so many young Christians, it was drilled into her head that homosexuality was a deep, dark sin and a desire that could NEVER be acted upon. Rev. Sundby poured over her Bible and spent hour after hour in prayer asking for God to reveal His will to her. The answer came suddenly and clearly:
…..the Holy Spirit asked me a simple question: “Elaine, how is someone saved?”
“What?” I replied, “That’s not what I’m asking.”
Not to be deterred, the Holy Spirit gently asked again: “How are you saved?” At that moment, the famous passage in Scripture came to mind:
John 3:16 (NIV): For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
The simplicity of the truth hit me. I had been asking the wrong question. The issue was not sin, but salvation! God had told us that “whosoever” (King James translation) believes in his son would not perish. “Whosoever” did not exclude anyone; instead, it included everyone. There was simply no group of people who would—or could—be excluded from accepting God’s salvation.
For Rev. Sundby, that resolved part one of a two-part issue. She was now clear that she would not be sentenced to Hell for being a lesbian, but would she be sinning if she allowed herself to develop a relationship with the woman she was strongly attracted to? Were homosexual relationships by their very nature a sin? Here’s how she answered that question.
It depends is my answer. Being gay or straight has nothing to do with it. The issue is really about the quality of the relationship we have with God, with others, and with ourselves. God simply asks us: “Is your relationship based on, and operating in, My love or not? Does it encourage both people to spiritually grow and deepen their union with God? Is it loving and healthy for both parties?” If your relationship encourages and enhances these things, then it most assuredly is not a sin.
Having that resolved, Rev. Sundby allowed herself to embrace the love of her life, Pam, and they are still happily together. She also answered the call to ministry and became the founding pastor at Faith Full Gospel Fellowship in San Leandro, California. She moved forward with Pam with this foundation:
God and sin simply cannot coexist together: it is impossible.
2 Corinthians 6:14 (NIV): For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
Therefore, my personal conclusions about what sin was, and was not, really didn’t matter. If being with Pam was a sin, it would cause a separation between God and me.
I found this a particularly important section where Rev. Sundby explains her understanding of why GLBT people are ostracized by so many Christians.
Fear is not from the Lord; it operates in Satan’s kingdom (1 John 4:18; Rom. 8:15), yet we build complete belief systems around our fears and prejudices, and people fight change. There is no getting around the fact that it’s far easier to understand how one can be gay and Christian when one is gay and Christian.
I have also found it common for those who consider homosexuality an “abomination” to “prove” their cause by quoting every Scripture they can find pertaining to sexual sin and promiscuity. It is important to understand that Christians in the gay community are also adamantly against sexual sin. The difference lies in the fact that we do not believe God has singled out any particular community or nation of people as “evil” or “sinful,” believing instead that God’s edicts are applied without prejudice to all people and communities—homosexual and heterosexual alike.
Rev. Sundby also wrote a section titled “Remain in the State in which You Were Called.”
Like the Gentiles before us, God has never asked us to change who we are in order to receive his salvation or the spiritual gifts.
1 Corinthians 7:24 (Amplified): “So, brethren, in whatever station or state or condition of life each one was when he was called, there let him continue with and close to God.
In closing, Rev. Sundby has a message for how GLBT Christians needed to move forward:
Our priorities seem reversed at times. We seek first for acceptance, and then for fellowship. The problem is that protesting, picketing, and attacks through the press only serve to drive the two parties further apart. This is not the witness Christ wants us to be demonstrating to the world. Our humanism is on display rather than the character of Christ.
…..We need to focus first on reaching out to the lost within our own communities and then on building relationships with others within the Christian community. The best witness they have that God has accepted homosexuals—is us! But there can be no witness if there is no relationship.
I often criticize leaders from the religious right for trying to force their will on legislators and even as amendments to the United States Constitution. While I encourage GLBT advocacy in the public square, the approach Rev. Sundby is also very important and, I believe, severely under-utilized.
“Calling the Rainbow Nation Home” is a wonderful book that I highly recommend to all GLBT people and heterosexuals who are interested in understanding the difficult path a gay person has to walk to reach God, and how to reconcile that with what they have been previously been taught about the sinfulness of homosexuality.
'Why It Matters Every Day"
I saw this on Pam's House Blend and decided to copy the entire post here without comment. None is really needed.
This is why living an out gay life, every unassuming day after every unassuming day, is so important.
My partner and I have lived in this small Mississippi town since 2002. While we haven't flown the rainbow flag, the old home we restored on the main drag made it pretty clear. Every day that we have lived here we have just been a part of this community in the same important, boring ways as everyone else.
Sure, we've had a few insults yelled at us and even had our house paintballed once. But the rest of the town got to see us give something back to this town, to have family members share in the joy of our lives, to have friends sit on the front porch and just watch the town go about its business.
Everyone recognized us, me especially because I took my walks right through the heart of town. At one particular house down the street I found a lonely married lady, crippled by mental and emotional issues, who rescued greyhounds. Everyday that I walked by, I waved and smiled. Later, she would come to the porch, and I would speak to her, the dogs, or her son. Finally, she stopped and asked me to have conversation.
I don't remember much about that first conversation, but I found her to be a bright, if troubled, young woman. And I always spoke, checked on her if she were absent, and just behaved neighborly.
Fast forward three more years and a big abandoned lot became available right beside her house. It was her husband's family place and he needed to sell it. We made an offer. And we began building our new house.
During this entire construction time, I and my partner and she and her husband dealt with each other on a more personal basis, with questions about fence allowances, adjoining trees, etc. We even worked out a way for our dogs to play together until the finishing touches on our fences could be made. In essence, we became more than neighbors; we became friends.
Just yesterday she came over to visit, "to have conversation," as she put it. She told me that that very first day that I walked by and waved had changed her life. That because of my constant friendliness she began to grow out of her depression and seclusion. And she so hoped that the man who wanted the lot would be my partner.
Her husband was leery, at best. But she told me she finally got him to see us as just people--people who would make the best neighbors. He relented and has since told her it was the best thing he ever did.
So today she wanted to come to tell me the impact I had on her life. And, with tears streaming down her face, to apologize for her cruelty to me personally in voting for the Mississippi Marriage Amendment.
Every day we make a difference. We must remember that.
This is why living an out gay life, every unassuming day after every unassuming day, is so important.
My partner and I have lived in this small Mississippi town since 2002. While we haven't flown the rainbow flag, the old home we restored on the main drag made it pretty clear. Every day that we have lived here we have just been a part of this community in the same important, boring ways as everyone else.
Sure, we've had a few insults yelled at us and even had our house paintballed once. But the rest of the town got to see us give something back to this town, to have family members share in the joy of our lives, to have friends sit on the front porch and just watch the town go about its business.
Everyone recognized us, me especially because I took my walks right through the heart of town. At one particular house down the street I found a lonely married lady, crippled by mental and emotional issues, who rescued greyhounds. Everyday that I walked by, I waved and smiled. Later, she would come to the porch, and I would speak to her, the dogs, or her son. Finally, she stopped and asked me to have conversation.
I don't remember much about that first conversation, but I found her to be a bright, if troubled, young woman. And I always spoke, checked on her if she were absent, and just behaved neighborly.
Fast forward three more years and a big abandoned lot became available right beside her house. It was her husband's family place and he needed to sell it. We made an offer. And we began building our new house.
During this entire construction time, I and my partner and she and her husband dealt with each other on a more personal basis, with questions about fence allowances, adjoining trees, etc. We even worked out a way for our dogs to play together until the finishing touches on our fences could be made. In essence, we became more than neighbors; we became friends.
Just yesterday she came over to visit, "to have conversation," as she put it. She told me that that very first day that I walked by and waved had changed her life. That because of my constant friendliness she began to grow out of her depression and seclusion. And she so hoped that the man who wanted the lot would be my partner.
Her husband was leery, at best. But she told me she finally got him to see us as just people--people who would make the best neighbors. He relented and has since told her it was the best thing he ever did.
So today she wanted to come to tell me the impact I had on her life. And, with tears streaming down her face, to apologize for her cruelty to me personally in voting for the Mississippi Marriage Amendment.
Every day we make a difference. We must remember that.
May 12, 2007
Let Them Pray Or They'll Sue
The Liberty Counsel, with the full support of Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority, is determined that any religious expression (that agrees with theirs) be allowed as part of upcoming high school graduation ceremonies across the United States. Falwell warns that anyone who tries to stop it will get hauled into court. This is an excerpt from Falwell's message:
I’m proud to stand with Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and dean of Liberty University School of Law, and his wife Anita, president of Liberty Counsel, in the national “Friend or Foe” Graduation Prayer Campaign.
This program is designed to educate and, if necessary, litigate to ensure that prayer and religious views are not suppressed during graduation ceremonies across the nation.
As part of this year's campaign, Liberty Counsel has created red prayer wristbands which students can wear as a reminder to pray at graduation and all throughout the school year.
The wristbands are embossed with “I WILL PRAY” and “PRAY WITHOUT CEASING (THESS. 5:17).”
The wristbands serve as reminders to students that they have the constitutional right to wear religious jewelry and to pray during non-instructional times while at school. Liberty Counsel also has a free legal memo on graduation prayer which is available online at www.LC.org.
Once again, the religious right seeks to force their will upon government officials (school boards that have jurisdiction over graduation ceremonies) under the guise of promoting "religious freedom."
Does that sound a bit harsh? Then consider this:
Back in Jesus' time, I'm sure there was something at least vaguely resembling today's commencement ceremonies. What if a school back then prohibited any religious expression during what served as their graduation. Can you picture Jesus approaching the decision makers and encouraging them to allow it? Perhaps. If His request was rejected, can you them imagine Him taking the issue to court? If you are even vaguely familiar with the Gospels in the Bible, I hope you can't.
Jesus didn't seek to shape civil laws in such a way that they encouraged, if not outright forced, people to acknowledge Him. He made it very clear that it was up to each individual to develop his or her own relationship with Him--that's what determined their destination for eternity. All of the civil laws, certainly the ones of the Phairasees in His time, wouldn't make any difference.
If Jesus had wanted to rule the government and establish a theocracy, He would have. He certainly could have, but it was not God's will. Jesus taught us humility and the importance of a one-on-one relationship with Him.
Try as they might, the religious right can't litigate or legislate that.
I’m proud to stand with Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and dean of Liberty University School of Law, and his wife Anita, president of Liberty Counsel, in the national “Friend or Foe” Graduation Prayer Campaign.
This program is designed to educate and, if necessary, litigate to ensure that prayer and religious views are not suppressed during graduation ceremonies across the nation.
As part of this year's campaign, Liberty Counsel has created red prayer wristbands which students can wear as a reminder to pray at graduation and all throughout the school year.
The wristbands are embossed with “I WILL PRAY” and “PRAY WITHOUT CEASING (THESS. 5:17).”
The wristbands serve as reminders to students that they have the constitutional right to wear religious jewelry and to pray during non-instructional times while at school. Liberty Counsel also has a free legal memo on graduation prayer which is available online at www.LC.org.
Once again, the religious right seeks to force their will upon government officials (school boards that have jurisdiction over graduation ceremonies) under the guise of promoting "religious freedom."
Does that sound a bit harsh? Then consider this:
Back in Jesus' time, I'm sure there was something at least vaguely resembling today's commencement ceremonies. What if a school back then prohibited any religious expression during what served as their graduation. Can you picture Jesus approaching the decision makers and encouraging them to allow it? Perhaps. If His request was rejected, can you them imagine Him taking the issue to court? If you are even vaguely familiar with the Gospels in the Bible, I hope you can't.
Jesus didn't seek to shape civil laws in such a way that they encouraged, if not outright forced, people to acknowledge Him. He made it very clear that it was up to each individual to develop his or her own relationship with Him--that's what determined their destination for eternity. All of the civil laws, certainly the ones of the Phairasees in His time, wouldn't make any difference.
If Jesus had wanted to rule the government and establish a theocracy, He would have. He certainly could have, but it was not God's will. Jesus taught us humility and the importance of a one-on-one relationship with Him.
Try as they might, the religious right can't litigate or legislate that.
May 11, 2007
Right Wing Out of Step With Jesus
I can already feel James Dobson or Jerry Falwell calling me a heretic just for typing that title, but I am clearly not the only one who feels that way. This editorial from the Charleston, WV Gazette makes the case (which I strongly support) that Jesus and other key figures in the Bible were liberals.
Jesus was a liberal. Absolutely and totally a liberal. Not a conservative bone in his body. He broke the rules. On purpose. He flaunted them, in fact, eating with sinners, healing on the Sabbath, rescuing a fallen woman, criticizing the establishment. And the well-to-do. He was not crucified because he was too conservative. The Christian faith is not about rules. Jesus’ first public utterance shows his compassion for the poor. He never asks us to sing pretty songs, to build cathedrals, or wiggle our fingers in the air. He tells Peter, “Feed my sheep.”
The Hebrew Prophets were liberals. By definition. Social critics. Reformers. Nathan stood face to face with King David, shook his finger and told him he was a murderer. Amos was a liberal. He measured the corruption of Beth’el up against the plumb line of justice. Amaziah told him to go home, “you troubler of Israel.” “Let justice roll down like waters,” Amos replied. Check Micah, Hosea and Isaiah while you’re at it.
These were not the Republicans of Palestine. They were not trying to shore up the establishment or save the wealthy.
Jeremiah was a liberal. He wrote the book on public protest and nonviolent direct action. He trod the streets of Jerusalem naked as a jaybird to make his point.
The history of the church is the story of liberal versus conservative religion. It begins in Jerusalem, when Peter and Paul struggle over the issue of circumcision. The great St. Augustine tells us to “love God and do whatever you want.” Not conservative there! Was Martin Luther a conservative when he challenged orthodoxy on 95 points of theology? Was John Wesley a conservative when he took his Bible to the streets and the coal mines of England? Were the Methodists in America conservative when, in 1908, they adopted the “Social Creed,” supporting the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively? And is our church conservative in its continued struggle for social justice, for the rights of women and minorities, for equal opportunity for all, for ecological responsibility — through the Social Principles and Social Creed?
In today's society, we also need people to step up and challenge traditional, conservative thought and policies. This is not a war on Christianity as some of the right-wingers spew to try and position themselves as victims. This is a war FOR the Christianity of Jesus and the prophets who preceeded him on Earth.
Those of us who are taking God's word into the GLBT community and preaching the errors and/or bigoted intent of conservatives who have worked hard to make them feel incomplete, inferior parts of society who are unwelcome in God's Kingdom, WE are doing His work.
We're doing it just the way Jesus taught us--by challenging the status quo and challenging religious rules that do not adhere to the example He set.
Jesus was a liberal. Absolutely and totally a liberal. Not a conservative bone in his body. He broke the rules. On purpose. He flaunted them, in fact, eating with sinners, healing on the Sabbath, rescuing a fallen woman, criticizing the establishment. And the well-to-do. He was not crucified because he was too conservative. The Christian faith is not about rules. Jesus’ first public utterance shows his compassion for the poor. He never asks us to sing pretty songs, to build cathedrals, or wiggle our fingers in the air. He tells Peter, “Feed my sheep.”
The Hebrew Prophets were liberals. By definition. Social critics. Reformers. Nathan stood face to face with King David, shook his finger and told him he was a murderer. Amos was a liberal. He measured the corruption of Beth’el up against the plumb line of justice. Amaziah told him to go home, “you troubler of Israel.” “Let justice roll down like waters,” Amos replied. Check Micah, Hosea and Isaiah while you’re at it.
These were not the Republicans of Palestine. They were not trying to shore up the establishment or save the wealthy.
Jeremiah was a liberal. He wrote the book on public protest and nonviolent direct action. He trod the streets of Jerusalem naked as a jaybird to make his point.
The history of the church is the story of liberal versus conservative religion. It begins in Jerusalem, when Peter and Paul struggle over the issue of circumcision. The great St. Augustine tells us to “love God and do whatever you want.” Not conservative there! Was Martin Luther a conservative when he challenged orthodoxy on 95 points of theology? Was John Wesley a conservative when he took his Bible to the streets and the coal mines of England? Were the Methodists in America conservative when, in 1908, they adopted the “Social Creed,” supporting the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively? And is our church conservative in its continued struggle for social justice, for the rights of women and minorities, for equal opportunity for all, for ecological responsibility — through the Social Principles and Social Creed?
In today's society, we also need people to step up and challenge traditional, conservative thought and policies. This is not a war on Christianity as some of the right-wingers spew to try and position themselves as victims. This is a war FOR the Christianity of Jesus and the prophets who preceeded him on Earth.
Those of us who are taking God's word into the GLBT community and preaching the errors and/or bigoted intent of conservatives who have worked hard to make them feel incomplete, inferior parts of society who are unwelcome in God's Kingdom, WE are doing His work.
We're doing it just the way Jesus taught us--by challenging the status quo and challenging religious rules that do not adhere to the example He set.
" A Seperate Fountain"
That's the title of this article on The Huffington Post by Sara Whitman, who has been legally married to her same-sex spouse in Massachusetts for nearly three years.
Her state is facing a challenge to legal same-sex marriage as there is a move in the state legislature to put the right to marry of couples like hers up for a public referendum vote. She writes about how that vote could impact her and other same-sex couples:
More than 8,000 gays and lesbians married in the last three years in Massachusetts. Amazingly, not one plague of locusts has descended, nor a single drop of fiery rain fallen.
In the 13 years before being legally married, my wife and I wrote legal documents to avert any questions about what would happen if either of us died, which may or may not have stood up in court. Luckily, we're both still here.
We have three children. We pay taxes. We go to school meetings, Little League baseball games and pick up endless pairs of socks that seem to multiply in dusty corners of the house.
Unlike our straight counterparts, who I'm sure have socks lying around, too, we had to do second parent adoptions so our kids would have as much protection as possible. We had to buy one family health insurance policy and one individual, because we were not considered legally a family.
When we're all swooping out the door for a vacation, with everyone is assigned their bag, their seat number and marching orders about who is not to touch whom, I dare anyone to tell me we're not a family.
Until three years ago, though, we legally were not. We did not have access to the 1,000-plus benefits of marriage. We put together as much legal protection as possible only because we were fortunate enough to be able to afford to do so.
Recently, someone told me that civil unions were an equal institution but that marriage is about religion. His church - an institution by law that is to be separate from government - said gay marriage was wrong. It was an argument of separate but equal, made by an African-American man. I wondered if the colored-only water fountains ever felt equal. Still a water fountain, after all. Just a separate one, so the purity of the white fountain would not be sullied.
Just like the purity of his definition of marriage, in his church, would not be sullied.
He was asking me to drink from another fountain. If marriage had no legal relevance and was only a religious symbol, I could go with it. But it doesn't. It is woven into the legal system, government benefits, and tax codes. It is a civil right. The laws and understanding of it comes about from years and years of legal precedents. It can't be replicated in a meaningful way.
Civil unions, in other words, are still a separate fountain.
There's more in her article. She offers a lot to think about and will hopefully encourage others in her state to lobby their representatives to vote against having civil rights put up for a popular vote.
Her state is facing a challenge to legal same-sex marriage as there is a move in the state legislature to put the right to marry of couples like hers up for a public referendum vote. She writes about how that vote could impact her and other same-sex couples:
More than 8,000 gays and lesbians married in the last three years in Massachusetts. Amazingly, not one plague of locusts has descended, nor a single drop of fiery rain fallen.
In the 13 years before being legally married, my wife and I wrote legal documents to avert any questions about what would happen if either of us died, which may or may not have stood up in court. Luckily, we're both still here.
We have three children. We pay taxes. We go to school meetings, Little League baseball games and pick up endless pairs of socks that seem to multiply in dusty corners of the house.
Unlike our straight counterparts, who I'm sure have socks lying around, too, we had to do second parent adoptions so our kids would have as much protection as possible. We had to buy one family health insurance policy and one individual, because we were not considered legally a family.
When we're all swooping out the door for a vacation, with everyone is assigned their bag, their seat number and marching orders about who is not to touch whom, I dare anyone to tell me we're not a family.
Until three years ago, though, we legally were not. We did not have access to the 1,000-plus benefits of marriage. We put together as much legal protection as possible only because we were fortunate enough to be able to afford to do so.
Recently, someone told me that civil unions were an equal institution but that marriage is about religion. His church - an institution by law that is to be separate from government - said gay marriage was wrong. It was an argument of separate but equal, made by an African-American man. I wondered if the colored-only water fountains ever felt equal. Still a water fountain, after all. Just a separate one, so the purity of the white fountain would not be sullied.
Just like the purity of his definition of marriage, in his church, would not be sullied.
He was asking me to drink from another fountain. If marriage had no legal relevance and was only a religious symbol, I could go with it. But it doesn't. It is woven into the legal system, government benefits, and tax codes. It is a civil right. The laws and understanding of it comes about from years and years of legal precedents. It can't be replicated in a meaningful way.
Civil unions, in other words, are still a separate fountain.
There's more in her article. She offers a lot to think about and will hopefully encourage others in her state to lobby their representatives to vote against having civil rights put up for a popular vote.
May 10, 2007
Look Who's Infiltrating Eastern Europe
This from the Advocate.com.
Many prominent U.S. conservative groups are shifting their attention overseas this week, attending a conference in Poland that will decry Europe's liberal social policies and portray the host nation as a valiant holdout bucking those trends.
The World Congress of Families is expected to draw more than 2,500 people from dozens of countries to Warsaw's Palace of Culture and Science from Friday through Sunday.
Cosponsors of the congress include the American Family Association, Concerned Women for America, the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, the Heritage Foundation, and the Seattle-based Discovery Institute, which promotes the ''intelligent design'' concept of the universe's origins. The U.S. groups are allied in opposition to abortion, same-sex marriage, and other policies they blame for weakening traditional families in Western Europe.
Boy, is that a rogues gallery of right-wingers or what?
The chief organizer is a Rockford, Ill.–based conservative think tank, the Howard Center. ''Europe is almost lost—to demographic winter and to the secularists,'' says a planning document for the congress. ''If Europe goes, much of the world will go with it. Almost alone, Poland has maintained strong faith and strong families.''
The congress, even in its planning stages, has been derided by liberal groups.
''It's a jamboree for people who very often find themselves outside the mainstream,'' said Jon O'Brien, president of Catholics for a Free Choice. ''They're living the fantasy for a couple of days of what the world would be like if their ideas prevailed.''
O'Brien, a native of Ireland now based in Washington, D.C., said Poland's conservative bent is at odds with most of the continent.
''American conservative groups don't find much succor in Europe,'' he said. ''It's moved on, toward tolerance and respect for how people live their lives, for people who are gay, single parents, different forms of family.''
GLBT people have generally fared better across the pond than their counterparts in the United States. Let's hope those who would spread their hate and bigotry across that continent meet with little or, preferably, no success.
Many prominent U.S. conservative groups are shifting their attention overseas this week, attending a conference in Poland that will decry Europe's liberal social policies and portray the host nation as a valiant holdout bucking those trends.
The World Congress of Families is expected to draw more than 2,500 people from dozens of countries to Warsaw's Palace of Culture and Science from Friday through Sunday.
Cosponsors of the congress include the American Family Association, Concerned Women for America, the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, the Heritage Foundation, and the Seattle-based Discovery Institute, which promotes the ''intelligent design'' concept of the universe's origins. The U.S. groups are allied in opposition to abortion, same-sex marriage, and other policies they blame for weakening traditional families in Western Europe.
Boy, is that a rogues gallery of right-wingers or what?
The chief organizer is a Rockford, Ill.–based conservative think tank, the Howard Center. ''Europe is almost lost—to demographic winter and to the secularists,'' says a planning document for the congress. ''If Europe goes, much of the world will go with it. Almost alone, Poland has maintained strong faith and strong families.''
The congress, even in its planning stages, has been derided by liberal groups.
''It's a jamboree for people who very often find themselves outside the mainstream,'' said Jon O'Brien, president of Catholics for a Free Choice. ''They're living the fantasy for a couple of days of what the world would be like if their ideas prevailed.''
O'Brien, a native of Ireland now based in Washington, D.C., said Poland's conservative bent is at odds with most of the continent.
''American conservative groups don't find much succor in Europe,'' he said. ''It's moved on, toward tolerance and respect for how people live their lives, for people who are gay, single parents, different forms of family.''
GLBT people have generally fared better across the pond than their counterparts in the United States. Let's hope those who would spread their hate and bigotry across that continent meet with little or, preferably, no success.
May 09, 2007
A Republican Congressman Opens His Mind
From the Washington Blade:
As pro-gay legislation makes its way through the new Democratic-controlled Congress, gay rights advocates have found a staunch supporter from the Republican side of the aisle.
Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) has emerged as a reliable gay rights advocate and is a lead sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and a sponsor of the hate crimes bill.
It wasn’t always this way.
In 1996, Shays voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which establishes marriage as between a man and woman in federal law.
But in an interview with the Blade this week, Shays said he has reconsidered his stance on gay rights.
“Gays and lesbians don’t want special rights,” he said. “They want the same as other Americans: equal protection under the law. They deserve no less.”
He said he changed his mind after watching media coverage of same-sex marriage ceremonies.
“My views on gay marriage have evolved since I voted for the Defense of Marriage Act,” he said. “At the time I thought I would not support gay marriages. But after watching the coverage of marriages being performed in states like California and New York, I have started to feel differently.
“I look at these marriages and wonder how they impact in any way the marriage I have with my wife,” he told the Blade this week. “I don’t think they do. I don’t think people need to fear this type of union. I recognize two people of the same sex can be involved in a loving, long-term relationship and feel no less love for one another than partners in a heterosexual relationship. Our challenge is to find a way to recognize a legally binding contractual relationship between two consenting adults of the same sex.”
Although Congressman Shays stops short of advocating for same-sex marriage, he has come a long way and realizes he doesn't have to defend his marriage or mine from anyone. Hopefully more folks on his side of the isle will invest enough of themselves in considering the issues like the congressman did. If so, it seems inevitable that they will reach a similar conclusion.
Thanks to gay news blog for the tip.
As pro-gay legislation makes its way through the new Democratic-controlled Congress, gay rights advocates have found a staunch supporter from the Republican side of the aisle.
Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) has emerged as a reliable gay rights advocate and is a lead sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and a sponsor of the hate crimes bill.
It wasn’t always this way.
In 1996, Shays voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which establishes marriage as between a man and woman in federal law.
But in an interview with the Blade this week, Shays said he has reconsidered his stance on gay rights.
“Gays and lesbians don’t want special rights,” he said. “They want the same as other Americans: equal protection under the law. They deserve no less.”
He said he changed his mind after watching media coverage of same-sex marriage ceremonies.
“My views on gay marriage have evolved since I voted for the Defense of Marriage Act,” he said. “At the time I thought I would not support gay marriages. But after watching the coverage of marriages being performed in states like California and New York, I have started to feel differently.
“I look at these marriages and wonder how they impact in any way the marriage I have with my wife,” he told the Blade this week. “I don’t think they do. I don’t think people need to fear this type of union. I recognize two people of the same sex can be involved in a loving, long-term relationship and feel no less love for one another than partners in a heterosexual relationship. Our challenge is to find a way to recognize a legally binding contractual relationship between two consenting adults of the same sex.”
Although Congressman Shays stops short of advocating for same-sex marriage, he has come a long way and realizes he doesn't have to defend his marriage or mine from anyone. Hopefully more folks on his side of the isle will invest enough of themselves in considering the issues like the congressman did. If so, it seems inevitable that they will reach a similar conclusion.
Thanks to gay news blog for the tip.
Calgary Church "Comes Out"
In a post I wrote yesterday titled, "Where Should GLBT Christians Go To Worship," the author of the article I linked to made the statement that churches seldom issued "engraved invitations" to GLBT people to come and visit their church. Oddly enough, thanks to PageOneQ, I ran across a story where a church in Calgary, Canada is practically doing just that.
Knox United, one of Calgary's oldest religious institutions, has opened its doors to the city's gay community.
The church will hold a special service Sunday (actually last Sunday) marking its decision to become an "affirming ministry."
Don Smith, chairman of Knox's affirming committee, said the decision to welcome the gay community was approved by a 98 per cent majority at a membership meeting in February.
"We decided this was something we needed to do for our soul," Smith said. "We're naming who we are."
About 80 to 120 people of Knox United's membership of about 800 are gay or lesbian, according to the church.
After moving to Calgary from Toronto, Marlene Hielema said she spent years searching for a supportive spiritual home before discovering Knox United.
This ceremony means a lot to me. It's one thing to have an understated acceptance, but quite another to come out publicly and say, 'This is where we stand,' " Hielema said.
Hielema said it's been harder coming out to the gay community that she is a Christian than being a lesbian within the Knox United congregation.
"A lot of gay people have really been emotionally wounded by organized religion," she said.
"There's been this constant feedback that how you live is wrong, it's a sin, you're excommunicated ... you name it."
God bless these enlightened folks up north. Congratulations for being strong in who you are and how you are led to worship God.
Knox United, one of Calgary's oldest religious institutions, has opened its doors to the city's gay community.
The church will hold a special service Sunday (actually last Sunday) marking its decision to become an "affirming ministry."
Don Smith, chairman of Knox's affirming committee, said the decision to welcome the gay community was approved by a 98 per cent majority at a membership meeting in February.
"We decided this was something we needed to do for our soul," Smith said. "We're naming who we are."
About 80 to 120 people of Knox United's membership of about 800 are gay or lesbian, according to the church.
After moving to Calgary from Toronto, Marlene Hielema said she spent years searching for a supportive spiritual home before discovering Knox United.
This ceremony means a lot to me. It's one thing to have an understated acceptance, but quite another to come out publicly and say, 'This is where we stand,' " Hielema said.
Hielema said it's been harder coming out to the gay community that she is a Christian than being a lesbian within the Knox United congregation.
"A lot of gay people have really been emotionally wounded by organized religion," she said.
"There's been this constant feedback that how you live is wrong, it's a sin, you're excommunicated ... you name it."
God bless these enlightened folks up north. Congratulations for being strong in who you are and how you are led to worship God.
May 08, 2007
How "Out" Are You?
That question came to my mind after reading this interesting article in the Washington Blade by Joey DiGuglielmo.
As much as the Blade encourages everyone to be out and be proud, I have to admit there are moments in my personal life where I choke a little. Or at least pause.
I was invited by Crystal Schelle, the features editor at the Journal, to submit a column for the paper’s 100th anniversary Monday. Crystal was my first editor and the Journal was the first paper I ever worked for. It’s the daily that covers my hometown, Martinsburg, W.Va., and the rest of the state’s Eastern Panhandle.
I also mentioned the Blade in my tagline at the end of the story: “Joey DiGuglielmo lives in Washington and is news editor of Washington Blade.”
So while it wasn’t even an explicit “I’m gay” proclamation, it still made me pause. There’s a difference between being out to some family, friends and acquaintances from my home town and announcing it in the newspaper there.
Don’t get me wrong — I certainly don’t think being gay is anything to be ashamed of, but I also don’t want to rub it in anyone’s face. I’ve never been a wear-it-on-your-sleeve kind of guy about being gay or anything else.
But baby steps are good to take. While mentioning I work at the Blade could hardly be considered a ballsy move, announcing it so my entire hometown, a small town in West Virginia, no less, was a good step to take.
I agree with many of the arguments voiced on this site that urge celebs like Anderson Cooper and Jodie Foster to come out if, in fact, they are gay. While I agree that such steps would be great for the gay community (you know — us “radical homosexuals!”), I have to also realize that little tinges I feel over small stuff like a tagline would be magnified a thousand times if I were as well known as Cooper or Foster.
I've dealt with that issue to a small extent myself. Although I am straight, I'm very selective who I tell about my GLBT advocacy and refer to this blog. Outside of my church and the GLBT community, there are a lot of people who know about my sportswriting but a mere handful who know about my "other life." I compartmentalize because, as I have written here numerous times, many people in the sports world don't exactly embrace GLBT people, and probably won't cozy up with their advocates either.
Perhaps, like Joey DiGuglielmo, I need to take some more baby steps myself.
As much as the Blade encourages everyone to be out and be proud, I have to admit there are moments in my personal life where I choke a little. Or at least pause.
I was invited by Crystal Schelle, the features editor at the Journal, to submit a column for the paper’s 100th anniversary Monday. Crystal was my first editor and the Journal was the first paper I ever worked for. It’s the daily that covers my hometown, Martinsburg, W.Va., and the rest of the state’s Eastern Panhandle.
I also mentioned the Blade in my tagline at the end of the story: “Joey DiGuglielmo lives in Washington and is news editor of Washington Blade.”
So while it wasn’t even an explicit “I’m gay” proclamation, it still made me pause. There’s a difference between being out to some family, friends and acquaintances from my home town and announcing it in the newspaper there.
Don’t get me wrong — I certainly don’t think being gay is anything to be ashamed of, but I also don’t want to rub it in anyone’s face. I’ve never been a wear-it-on-your-sleeve kind of guy about being gay or anything else.
But baby steps are good to take. While mentioning I work at the Blade could hardly be considered a ballsy move, announcing it so my entire hometown, a small town in West Virginia, no less, was a good step to take.
I agree with many of the arguments voiced on this site that urge celebs like Anderson Cooper and Jodie Foster to come out if, in fact, they are gay. While I agree that such steps would be great for the gay community (you know — us “radical homosexuals!”), I have to also realize that little tinges I feel over small stuff like a tagline would be magnified a thousand times if I were as well known as Cooper or Foster.
I've dealt with that issue to a small extent myself. Although I am straight, I'm very selective who I tell about my GLBT advocacy and refer to this blog. Outside of my church and the GLBT community, there are a lot of people who know about my sportswriting but a mere handful who know about my "other life." I compartmentalize because, as I have written here numerous times, many people in the sports world don't exactly embrace GLBT people, and probably won't cozy up with their advocates either.
Perhaps, like Joey DiGuglielmo, I need to take some more baby steps myself.
Where Should GLBT Christians Go to Worship?
That's the question being asked in this essay from Whosoever Magazine:
Some of us seem to be waiting for an engraved invitation, while others won't leave until the congregation threatens to stone us. One way or the other, we don't seem to have a very good sense of where we belong and where we don't - or, to put it a better way, which churches deserve us and which don't.
Polls consistently show that to know us is to love us. Those who most hate and fear gays think they don't know any. We can't change hearts and minds from afar. My concern, in this essay, is those "borderline" congregations, in which we very likely would be welcome - if we made the effort to be.
I often wonder if GLBT Christians realize how welcome we'd be at many of the churches that do NOT send out engraved invitations. I wonder if they realize why, for some churches, rolling out a rainbow carpet might not be wise - not because they don't want us, but simply because they don't want the trouble they're afraid we will bring with us.
There are a whole lot of nuts out there. Is it worth getting picketed, vandalized, targeted in the wingnut media and possibly even disciplined by the denomination for the sake of issuing a call that might be heeded by no more than a handful of people? That's a question I must admit, if I were a pastor, I'd find hard to answer.
If you're gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and you want to go to church, the simple fact is that there are many more to choose from than you might think. Most won't hang out a rainbow flag, or take out advertisements. We have to learn to detect them.
How do you feel about that? Do you think there are ample worship opportunities available for you? Would you be willing to stake out a spot in a largely heterosexual congregation or do you need to be with mostly GLBT people to be comfortable and establish a sense of family?
Some of us seem to be waiting for an engraved invitation, while others won't leave until the congregation threatens to stone us. One way or the other, we don't seem to have a very good sense of where we belong and where we don't - or, to put it a better way, which churches deserve us and which don't.
Polls consistently show that to know us is to love us. Those who most hate and fear gays think they don't know any. We can't change hearts and minds from afar. My concern, in this essay, is those "borderline" congregations, in which we very likely would be welcome - if we made the effort to be.
I often wonder if GLBT Christians realize how welcome we'd be at many of the churches that do NOT send out engraved invitations. I wonder if they realize why, for some churches, rolling out a rainbow carpet might not be wise - not because they don't want us, but simply because they don't want the trouble they're afraid we will bring with us.
There are a whole lot of nuts out there. Is it worth getting picketed, vandalized, targeted in the wingnut media and possibly even disciplined by the denomination for the sake of issuing a call that might be heeded by no more than a handful of people? That's a question I must admit, if I were a pastor, I'd find hard to answer.
If you're gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and you want to go to church, the simple fact is that there are many more to choose from than you might think. Most won't hang out a rainbow flag, or take out advertisements. We have to learn to detect them.
How do you feel about that? Do you think there are ample worship opportunities available for you? Would you be willing to stake out a spot in a largely heterosexual congregation or do you need to be with mostly GLBT people to be comfortable and establish a sense of family?
May 07, 2007
Canadian Study Shows That Same-Sex Couples As Good, If Not Better, Than Straight Parents
From the report on Canada.com:
Parenting by same-sex families is just as good -- if not slightly advantageous -- for children when compared to heterosexual families, a Justice Department study has concluded.
The report says the strongest conclusion that can be drawn from empirical literature is that the vast majority of studies show that children living with two mothers and children living with a mother and father have the same levels and qualities of social competence.
"A few studies suggest that children with two lesbian mothers may have marginally better social competence than children in traditional nuclear' families, even fewer studies show the opposite, and most studies fail to find any differences," says the 74-page study.
The article adds speculation that the study, completed in 2003, was witheld from the public because the results did not suit the conservative Canadian government leadership. Sounds like something that would happen in the Bush administration, doesn't it?
The site Good As You had an entertaining and dead-on take on this:
And why are these kids sometimes more well-adjusted socially, you ask? Well, isn't it obvious? While kids of heterosexual parents are forced to dedicate two days a year to celebrating their parents, kids o' gays are able to consolidate their parental celebrations into one Mothers/Fathers Day blowout. That extra day to focus on social competency gives them just a little bit of an edge over their reared-by-'rosexual peers. Obviously.
Or, it could just be that gays aren't the child destroying, society corrupting, evil demon spawn that so many have accused them of being, but are instead good people who are just as capable of proficient kid rearing as anyone else. We're open to both options; although we must admit we think the Mother/Fathers Day thing might really be something! Hell, just think of the vital social betterment time that you save on greeting cards alone...
The next time you hear opponents of same-sex adoption say their opposition is out of concern for the welfare of the children, you may want to ask them to either consider the facts or admit what their REAL reason is.
Parenting by same-sex families is just as good -- if not slightly advantageous -- for children when compared to heterosexual families, a Justice Department study has concluded.
The report says the strongest conclusion that can be drawn from empirical literature is that the vast majority of studies show that children living with two mothers and children living with a mother and father have the same levels and qualities of social competence.
"A few studies suggest that children with two lesbian mothers may have marginally better social competence than children in traditional nuclear' families, even fewer studies show the opposite, and most studies fail to find any differences," says the 74-page study.
The article adds speculation that the study, completed in 2003, was witheld from the public because the results did not suit the conservative Canadian government leadership. Sounds like something that would happen in the Bush administration, doesn't it?
The site Good As You had an entertaining and dead-on take on this:
And why are these kids sometimes more well-adjusted socially, you ask? Well, isn't it obvious? While kids of heterosexual parents are forced to dedicate two days a year to celebrating their parents, kids o' gays are able to consolidate their parental celebrations into one Mothers/Fathers Day blowout. That extra day to focus on social competency gives them just a little bit of an edge over their reared-by-'rosexual peers. Obviously.
Or, it could just be that gays aren't the child destroying, society corrupting, evil demon spawn that so many have accused them of being, but are instead good people who are just as capable of proficient kid rearing as anyone else. We're open to both options; although we must admit we think the Mother/Fathers Day thing might really be something! Hell, just think of the vital social betterment time that you save on greeting cards alone...
The next time you hear opponents of same-sex adoption say their opposition is out of concern for the welfare of the children, you may want to ask them to either consider the facts or admit what their REAL reason is.
Amaechi: "I Underestimated America"
Former NBA player John Amachi, who recently came out as gay, says the reaction to that news has been "overwhelmingly supportive and positive."
"I underestimated America. I braced myself for the wrath of a nation under God," Amaechi said at the Log Cabin Republicans' annual convention. "I imagined that it would be a firestorm, that it would be some insane number of letters demanding my deportation or my death.
"And in fact, 95 percent of the correspondence I've had have been overwhelmingly supportive and positive," Amaechi said. "But I will say that the 5 percent that I've had have been unbelievably, viscerally, frighteningly negative."
Not surprisingly, the reaction of his former teammates and employers has been quite different:
"Probably 30 of my former [NBA] teammates have my e-mail and my telephone contacts and probably 16 or so of those I was in regular touch with and there are probably 10 people who I have [on instant messenger]. And zero -- nobody -- who's active in the NBA has been in touch with me since the day I came out, despite the fact that most of them knew I was gay in the first place," Amaechi said.
He also wondered why nba.com, the league's official Web site, has never mentioned his homosexuality when it was such a huge sports story everywhere else.
There is a lot more in the ESPN article about how Amaechi sees the sports world slowly, much more so than the balance of society, moving toward accepting GLBT people and his recent experience as a "gay sports ambassador" that is worth checking out.
"I underestimated America. I braced myself for the wrath of a nation under God," Amaechi said at the Log Cabin Republicans' annual convention. "I imagined that it would be a firestorm, that it would be some insane number of letters demanding my deportation or my death.
"And in fact, 95 percent of the correspondence I've had have been overwhelmingly supportive and positive," Amaechi said. "But I will say that the 5 percent that I've had have been unbelievably, viscerally, frighteningly negative."
Not surprisingly, the reaction of his former teammates and employers has been quite different:
"Probably 30 of my former [NBA] teammates have my e-mail and my telephone contacts and probably 16 or so of those I was in regular touch with and there are probably 10 people who I have [on instant messenger]. And zero -- nobody -- who's active in the NBA has been in touch with me since the day I came out, despite the fact that most of them knew I was gay in the first place," Amaechi said.
He also wondered why nba.com, the league's official Web site, has never mentioned his homosexuality when it was such a huge sports story everywhere else.
There is a lot more in the ESPN article about how Amaechi sees the sports world slowly, much more so than the balance of society, moving toward accepting GLBT people and his recent experience as a "gay sports ambassador" that is worth checking out.
May 06, 2007
"The Beginning of the End of the Religious Right?"
You see that headline and assume it's someone opposed to the religious right authoring it, don't you? Wrong. The writer of the column carrying that headline is Cal Thomas, a card-carrying member of the religious right and an outspoken advocate for their cause in his syndicated columns, radio shows, and Fox News.
The clumn was prompted by the closing of what Thomas referred to as "One of the major players in what came to be know as the 'Religious Right' in the 1980's," The Center for Reclaming America for Christ. This was a part of Dr. James Kennedy's (one of the more extreme of the right-wing preachers that has infiltrated politics) Coral Rigde Ministries.
Thomas uses this occasion to give a brief overview of where he believes the conservative Christian insertion into the national political process stands, and it's not pretty:
Nearly 30 years after religious conservatives decided to re-enter the political arena -- after abandoning it as "dirty" and leading to compromise -- what do they have to show for it? The country remains sharply divided and the reconciling message they used to preach has been obscured by the crass pursuit of the golden ring of political power. In the end, they got neither the power, nor the Kingdom; only the glory and even that is now fading, as these older leaders pass from the scene. (James Kennedy is 76 years old and recovering from a heart attack).
Too many conservative Christians have focused on the "seen" rather than the "unseen," thinking appearances at the White House, or on "Meet the Press," is evidence that they are making a difference. And too much attention has been paid to individual personalities, rather than to the One these preachers had originally been called to exalt.
To paraphrase a verse familiar to most Christians, what shall it profit a man if he gains the White House, but loses his own soul?
Christians are also fond of saying God never closes one door without opening another door. The "door" of the Center for Reclaiming America has closed. The new doors can produce a more effective politics, if what's on the other side is based on a message that has less to do with partisanship and more to do with the One who transcends all politics and Who lends His power only to those who will use it as He instructed.
These are some powerful and, I believe, inspired words from someone who generally sits on the other side of the isle from me when it comes down to the issues of the day. His points about religious leaders focusing on politics and losing their focus on God is dead on. If his perspective would be given serious consideration by men like James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Tony Perkins, etc., we would see a much different and far less antagonistic and polarized political landscape, one which might actually focus on acceptance of ALL people and the care of those who are sick and/or poor.
Wayne Besen, Executive Director of the GLBT advocacy organization Truth Wins Out, wrote this about the closing of the Center for Reclaiming America for Christ:
Today we celebrate the demise of one of the most insidious anti-gay groups in America that incited intolerance by pumping out virulently anti-gay propaganda,” said Truth Wins Out’s Executive Director Wayne Besen. “The Center for Reclaiming America for Christ bet the bank on the ‘ex-gay’ message, and by doing so, bankrupted their credibility after their rising ‘ex-gay’ star crashed and burned.”
“This is a cautionary tale for right wing organizations that think jumping on the ‘ex-gay’ bandwagon is good politics,” said TWO’s Besen. “In the short term, it might cause some opponents to shudder, but in the end, it may lead to the shuttering of windows and doors with a sign that reads, ‘Out of Business.’”
Let's hope Besen is right and that, as people become more aware of reality, it becomes more difficult for organizations to gain anything by using the whole "ex-gay" myth and the people who allow themselves to be exploited by it.
The clumn was prompted by the closing of what Thomas referred to as "One of the major players in what came to be know as the 'Religious Right' in the 1980's," The Center for Reclaming America for Christ. This was a part of Dr. James Kennedy's (one of the more extreme of the right-wing preachers that has infiltrated politics) Coral Rigde Ministries.
Thomas uses this occasion to give a brief overview of where he believes the conservative Christian insertion into the national political process stands, and it's not pretty:
Nearly 30 years after religious conservatives decided to re-enter the political arena -- after abandoning it as "dirty" and leading to compromise -- what do they have to show for it? The country remains sharply divided and the reconciling message they used to preach has been obscured by the crass pursuit of the golden ring of political power. In the end, they got neither the power, nor the Kingdom; only the glory and even that is now fading, as these older leaders pass from the scene. (James Kennedy is 76 years old and recovering from a heart attack).
Too many conservative Christians have focused on the "seen" rather than the "unseen," thinking appearances at the White House, or on "Meet the Press," is evidence that they are making a difference. And too much attention has been paid to individual personalities, rather than to the One these preachers had originally been called to exalt.
To paraphrase a verse familiar to most Christians, what shall it profit a man if he gains the White House, but loses his own soul?
Christians are also fond of saying God never closes one door without opening another door. The "door" of the Center for Reclaiming America has closed. The new doors can produce a more effective politics, if what's on the other side is based on a message that has less to do with partisanship and more to do with the One who transcends all politics and Who lends His power only to those who will use it as He instructed.
These are some powerful and, I believe, inspired words from someone who generally sits on the other side of the isle from me when it comes down to the issues of the day. His points about religious leaders focusing on politics and losing their focus on God is dead on. If his perspective would be given serious consideration by men like James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Tony Perkins, etc., we would see a much different and far less antagonistic and polarized political landscape, one which might actually focus on acceptance of ALL people and the care of those who are sick and/or poor.
Wayne Besen, Executive Director of the GLBT advocacy organization Truth Wins Out, wrote this about the closing of the Center for Reclaiming America for Christ:
Today we celebrate the demise of one of the most insidious anti-gay groups in America that incited intolerance by pumping out virulently anti-gay propaganda,” said Truth Wins Out’s Executive Director Wayne Besen. “The Center for Reclaiming America for Christ bet the bank on the ‘ex-gay’ message, and by doing so, bankrupted their credibility after their rising ‘ex-gay’ star crashed and burned.”
“This is a cautionary tale for right wing organizations that think jumping on the ‘ex-gay’ bandwagon is good politics,” said TWO’s Besen. “In the short term, it might cause some opponents to shudder, but in the end, it may lead to the shuttering of windows and doors with a sign that reads, ‘Out of Business.’”
Let's hope Besen is right and that, as people become more aware of reality, it becomes more difficult for organizations to gain anything by using the whole "ex-gay" myth and the people who allow themselves to be exploited by it.
May 05, 2007
Faith In America Launches "Call to Courage" Tour
From the Faith In America website:
Faith in America has announced the launch of a five-city "Call to Courage" campaign to educate Americans about the misuse of religious teachings to discriminate and isolate gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. The campaign officially kicks off on May 6th in Ames, Iowa.
"Today marks an important day in the shared history of America’s religious and GLBT communities. For a long time we’ve stood on separate sides of an impasse” said Jimmy Creech, Executive Director of Faith In America. “But through this education campaign we will begin a deep and sustained dialogue, to bridge the gaps of tolerance and understanding in this country."
FIA’s national campaign will proceed to Reno, Nevada; Greenville, South Carolina; Manchester, New Hampshire; and Colorado Springs, Colorado. The five campaigns will be held between May and the end of November 2007.
Faith In America through the five-city campaign will:
Create dialogue regarding religious teachings and practices which foster discrimination and oppression against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.
Demonstrate how misguided religious teachings were used historically to justify injustice and discrimination (slavery, racism, anti-interracial marriage, sexism) and are being used today to deny full and equal rights to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens.
Provide accepting clergy and people of faith a forum to express disagreement with religion-based bigotry.
This is the mission statement of this organization:
To end legal and spiritual discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) people in America and to gain full and equal rights for those citizens.
Can anyone here support that? I thought so. I recommend checking them out if you're anywhere near one of the towns they will be visiting.
Faith in America has announced the launch of a five-city "Call to Courage" campaign to educate Americans about the misuse of religious teachings to discriminate and isolate gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. The campaign officially kicks off on May 6th in Ames, Iowa.
"Today marks an important day in the shared history of America’s religious and GLBT communities. For a long time we’ve stood on separate sides of an impasse” said Jimmy Creech, Executive Director of Faith In America. “But through this education campaign we will begin a deep and sustained dialogue, to bridge the gaps of tolerance and understanding in this country."
FIA’s national campaign will proceed to Reno, Nevada; Greenville, South Carolina; Manchester, New Hampshire; and Colorado Springs, Colorado. The five campaigns will be held between May and the end of November 2007.
Faith In America through the five-city campaign will:
Create dialogue regarding religious teachings and practices which foster discrimination and oppression against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.
Demonstrate how misguided religious teachings were used historically to justify injustice and discrimination (slavery, racism, anti-interracial marriage, sexism) and are being used today to deny full and equal rights to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens.
Provide accepting clergy and people of faith a forum to express disagreement with religion-based bigotry.
This is the mission statement of this organization:
To end legal and spiritual discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) people in America and to gain full and equal rights for those citizens.
Can anyone here support that? I thought so. I recommend checking them out if you're anywhere near one of the towns they will be visiting.
Recent Breakthroughs for GLBT People in Legislatures
"We have seen in the last month at almost every major win, almost always there is an openly gay legislator behind that story," says Denis Dison of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, which helps elect openly gay or transgender officials, who now number 370.
There has been a substantial list of victories for GLBT people in state legislatures across the United States in recent weeks. This article from Alternet provides a good summary of them.
At least in portions of this country, there is momentum building to move toward GLBT equality.
There has been a substantial list of victories for GLBT people in state legislatures across the United States in recent weeks. This article from Alternet provides a good summary of them.
At least in portions of this country, there is momentum building to move toward GLBT equality.
May 04, 2007
McCain: Gay Troops Put Others "At Grave Risk"
John McCain, a senator from Arizona, is running for the Republican presidential nomination. It appears that a major part of his strategy is to court the extreme right-wing. He's already cozied up to one of the godfathers of the religious right, Jerry Falwell, and he's now taken a major swipe at the GLBT community.
As reported by The Advocate, McCain dropped a note to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy organization for GLBT soldiers. According to the report, Sen. McCain wrote in regards to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy:
"I believe polarization of personnel and breakdown of unit effectiveness is too high a price to pay for well-intentioned but misguided efforts to elevate the interests of a minority of homosexual service members above those of their units.
"Most importantly, the national security of the United States, not to mention the lives of our men and women in uniform, are put at grave risk by policies detrimental to the good order and discipline which so distinguish America's armed services."
Fortunately, there are more reasoned opinions on this issue:
In a March op-ed in The Washington Post, GOP former senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming wrote, "I believe it is critical that we review—and overturn—the ban on gay service members in the military. I voted for 'don't ask, don't tell.' But much has changed since 1993.... We need every able-bodied, smart patriot to help us win this war."
"Senator McCain's comments are out of step with the overwhelming majority of the American people, and out of touch with the best interests of our armed forces," said Sharra Greer, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's director of law and policy, in a written statement Thursday.
"Senator McCain's defense of this counterproductive law is disrespectful to the more than 65,000 lesbian and gay service members on duty today."
I don't honestly understand how any GLBT people or advocates could vote for a Republican president, but in case you're tempted by Senator McCain, I suggest you keep this in mind.
The entire letter McCain wrote to the SLDN is available here:
As reported by The Advocate, McCain dropped a note to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy organization for GLBT soldiers. According to the report, Sen. McCain wrote in regards to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy:
"I believe polarization of personnel and breakdown of unit effectiveness is too high a price to pay for well-intentioned but misguided efforts to elevate the interests of a minority of homosexual service members above those of their units.
"Most importantly, the national security of the United States, not to mention the lives of our men and women in uniform, are put at grave risk by policies detrimental to the good order and discipline which so distinguish America's armed services."
Fortunately, there are more reasoned opinions on this issue:
In a March op-ed in The Washington Post, GOP former senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming wrote, "I believe it is critical that we review—and overturn—the ban on gay service members in the military. I voted for 'don't ask, don't tell.' But much has changed since 1993.... We need every able-bodied, smart patriot to help us win this war."
"Senator McCain's comments are out of step with the overwhelming majority of the American people, and out of touch with the best interests of our armed forces," said Sharra Greer, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's director of law and policy, in a written statement Thursday.
"Senator McCain's defense of this counterproductive law is disrespectful to the more than 65,000 lesbian and gay service members on duty today."
I don't honestly understand how any GLBT people or advocates could vote for a Republican president, but in case you're tempted by Senator McCain, I suggest you keep this in mind.
The entire letter McCain wrote to the SLDN is available here:
Announcing the 11th Edition of the International Carnival of Pozitives
The newest edition of the International Carnival of Pozitives, the periodic collection of blog posts, videos, and news items that deal with issues surrounding HIV/AIDS, is now available at Living in the Bonus Round.
If you want to check out previous editions, click on the International Carnival of Pozitives home page.
I'm proud that I'll be hosting the 14th edition coming up in August.
If you want to check out previous editions, click on the International Carnival of Pozitives home page.
I'm proud that I'll be hosting the 14th edition coming up in August.
May 03, 2007
Did Christians Lose a Round Today?
With the passage of the Matthew Shepard Bill (hate crimes legislation including sexual orientation as a protected minority), did Christians suffer a defeat today?
Right-wing extremists did, but from where I sit and worship God, it was a good day for Christianity. The scare tactics organizations like the Traditional Values Coalition, the Family Research Council, and the American Family Association used to try and sway votes failed. They wanted people to believe it would infringe on their right to worship (read: gay bash), touting it as a blow to religious freedom. The TVC went so far as to send around a tasteless picture of Jesus on a wanted poster, saying he would be subject to prosocution if this bill makes it into law.
A more reasoned, factual approach came from the ACLU:
"Prosecuting violent hate crimes is critically important. This bill will also protect due process and the Constitution, especially our First Amendment rights to speak freely and associate with whom we'd like," said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "When a person inflicts violence based on hate, it is important that they be punished. But defendants must have a fair trial, and should not be judged based on what they say and the company they keep, unless specifically related to the crime. While we may disagree with some people's speech, it must be protected or all of our speech is at risk. "
There it is right-wingers, your right to spew hatred and bigotry is still protected under the First Amendment and is NOT diminished by this law, unless it can be directly proven that your words contributed to a violent act being committed. If you are preaching the word of God, that shouldn't be a problem. When did Jesus incite anyone to violence? Not a single time. He even rebuked Peter when he slashed the ear off one of the guards who were arresting Jesus and went so far as to heal the soldier.
I called in and spoke on the air for a moment with Michelangelo Signorile, who hosts a program on Sirius OutQ Radio from 2-6PM Eastern Monday thru Friday. Understandably, Michelangelo and his callers had spent some time bashing "right-wing Christians" because of their over-the-top opposition to the Matthew Shepard Bill. I wanted to take a moment to remind everyone listening that there are straight Christians who have received the revalation of the GLBT community's place in God's kingdom, a place that is equal to the one I have. I emphasized how important it was for my fellow enlightened Christians to stand up and speak out for GLBT equality since the right-wing, although possibly diminishing in stature, is still a powerful, well-funded force. Michelangelo received what I said in a very positive way and expresseded his view that the majority of Christians share my beliefs. I think that might be somewhat optimistic, but if that's not the case now, I believe it is only a matter of time before it is.
The right-wing extremists will stop at nothing, including besmirching Christianity and God himself to enforce their bigoted, hateful views toward homosexuals. Affirming believers need to get angry about that, stay that way, and channel that anger positively in advocating for the GLBT community and spreading a clearer understanding of who God truly is. There are too many scripture references showing what a loving, accepting God we have to quote here--that's what most of the Bible is about because that's what God is about.
I believe He is happy with the way today's vote turned out and will be happier when more of His children have better legal protection against hatred and violence.
Right-wing extremists did, but from where I sit and worship God, it was a good day for Christianity. The scare tactics organizations like the Traditional Values Coalition, the Family Research Council, and the American Family Association used to try and sway votes failed. They wanted people to believe it would infringe on their right to worship (read: gay bash), touting it as a blow to religious freedom. The TVC went so far as to send around a tasteless picture of Jesus on a wanted poster, saying he would be subject to prosocution if this bill makes it into law.
A more reasoned, factual approach came from the ACLU:
"Prosecuting violent hate crimes is critically important. This bill will also protect due process and the Constitution, especially our First Amendment rights to speak freely and associate with whom we'd like," said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "When a person inflicts violence based on hate, it is important that they be punished. But defendants must have a fair trial, and should not be judged based on what they say and the company they keep, unless specifically related to the crime. While we may disagree with some people's speech, it must be protected or all of our speech is at risk. "
There it is right-wingers, your right to spew hatred and bigotry is still protected under the First Amendment and is NOT diminished by this law, unless it can be directly proven that your words contributed to a violent act being committed. If you are preaching the word of God, that shouldn't be a problem. When did Jesus incite anyone to violence? Not a single time. He even rebuked Peter when he slashed the ear off one of the guards who were arresting Jesus and went so far as to heal the soldier.
I called in and spoke on the air for a moment with Michelangelo Signorile, who hosts a program on Sirius OutQ Radio from 2-6PM Eastern Monday thru Friday. Understandably, Michelangelo and his callers had spent some time bashing "right-wing Christians" because of their over-the-top opposition to the Matthew Shepard Bill. I wanted to take a moment to remind everyone listening that there are straight Christians who have received the revalation of the GLBT community's place in God's kingdom, a place that is equal to the one I have. I emphasized how important it was for my fellow enlightened Christians to stand up and speak out for GLBT equality since the right-wing, although possibly diminishing in stature, is still a powerful, well-funded force. Michelangelo received what I said in a very positive way and expresseded his view that the majority of Christians share my beliefs. I think that might be somewhat optimistic, but if that's not the case now, I believe it is only a matter of time before it is.
The right-wing extremists will stop at nothing, including besmirching Christianity and God himself to enforce their bigoted, hateful views toward homosexuals. Affirming believers need to get angry about that, stay that way, and channel that anger positively in advocating for the GLBT community and spreading a clearer understanding of who God truly is. There are too many scripture references showing what a loving, accepting God we have to quote here--that's what most of the Bible is about because that's what God is about.
I believe He is happy with the way today's vote turned out and will be happier when more of His children have better legal protection against hatred and violence.
A Major Evangelist Moves Toward Acceptance
This is an excerpt from an interview evangelist Tony Campolo gave to Rev! Magazine, a publication targeting church pastors and leaders.
Have you changed your perspective on the issue of homosexuality over the years?
Campolo: I made up my mind in my mid-20s about this issue. The first time I began to encounter any intelligent discussion on this was when I was a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania. I began at that point to collect research and interview people who were homosexuals because I was doing my studies in the sociology of the family and this was a major issue. I came to the conclusion from a biblical perspective that I had to be faithful to what I thought the Scripture was teaching. Romans 1 does not allow for this behavior, but to condemn people for having feelings that they never chose to have seems crazy to say the least. That was my conclusion.
How out of step do you feel with your fellow evangelicals on this issue?
Campolo: Over the last few years I've become increasingly uncomfortable with my fellow evangelical Christians because they refuse to face the fact that in the overwhelming number of cases homosexuals do not change -- no matter hard they pray. I always emphasize that there are exceptions. But can people be prayed out of Alzheimer's disease? Of course, they can. Do you know anybody who has? I don't. The fact that God can do anything should not be questioned, but to say that you can pray yourself out of homosexuality creates a real problem. Many parents end up being alienated from their own children who are homosexual because they believe that if their kids would just get serious and pray about this they would be delivered. I could give you heart-breaking stories, of boys in particular, who cannot go home and see their parents because their parents say, "Until you repent and pray for God to change you, you can't come home."
There are two points I want to make here. First, although he stops short of total acceptance of homosexuals, he is clearly concerned about the "ex-gay" movement and strongly discredits it.
Second, he showed his views and understanding of God and His Word is still growing. Campolo is one of the best known evangelists and religious authors in the world, yet he was comfortable enough with himself to admit that he didn't, and still doesn't, have all the answers.
This is yet another example of someone who keeps his mind and heart open moving in the direction of understanding and accepting GLBT people as equal partners in the Kingdom of God. The more evangelists that come forward with this type of approach, the more isolated the hate mongers like James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson will become.
Have you changed your perspective on the issue of homosexuality over the years?
Campolo: I made up my mind in my mid-20s about this issue. The first time I began to encounter any intelligent discussion on this was when I was a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania. I began at that point to collect research and interview people who were homosexuals because I was doing my studies in the sociology of the family and this was a major issue. I came to the conclusion from a biblical perspective that I had to be faithful to what I thought the Scripture was teaching. Romans 1 does not allow for this behavior, but to condemn people for having feelings that they never chose to have seems crazy to say the least. That was my conclusion.
How out of step do you feel with your fellow evangelicals on this issue?
Campolo: Over the last few years I've become increasingly uncomfortable with my fellow evangelical Christians because they refuse to face the fact that in the overwhelming number of cases homosexuals do not change -- no matter hard they pray. I always emphasize that there are exceptions. But can people be prayed out of Alzheimer's disease? Of course, they can. Do you know anybody who has? I don't. The fact that God can do anything should not be questioned, but to say that you can pray yourself out of homosexuality creates a real problem. Many parents end up being alienated from their own children who are homosexual because they believe that if their kids would just get serious and pray about this they would be delivered. I could give you heart-breaking stories, of boys in particular, who cannot go home and see their parents because their parents say, "Until you repent and pray for God to change you, you can't come home."
There are two points I want to make here. First, although he stops short of total acceptance of homosexuals, he is clearly concerned about the "ex-gay" movement and strongly discredits it.
Second, he showed his views and understanding of God and His Word is still growing. Campolo is one of the best known evangelists and religious authors in the world, yet he was comfortable enough with himself to admit that he didn't, and still doesn't, have all the answers.
This is yet another example of someone who keeps his mind and heart open moving in the direction of understanding and accepting GLBT people as equal partners in the Kingdom of God. The more evangelists that come forward with this type of approach, the more isolated the hate mongers like James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, and Pat Robertson will become.
May 02, 2007
Colleges Becoming Hotbed of Religious Study & Activity
A funny thing is happening on college campuses these days according to this report in the New York Times:
Peter J. Gomes has been at Harvard University for 37 years, and says he remembers when religious people on campus felt under siege. To be seen as religious often meant being dismissed as not very bright, he said.
No longer. At Harvard these days, said Professor Gomes, the university preacher, “There is probably more active religious life now than there has been in 100 years.”
Across the country, on secular campuses as varied as Colgate University, the University of Wisconsin and the University of California, Berkeley, chaplains, professors and administrators say students are drawn to religion and spirituality with more fervor than at any time they can remember.
University officials explained the surge of interest in religion as partly a result of the rise of the religious right in politics, which they said has made questions of faith more talked about generally. In addition, they said, the attacks of Sept. 11 underscored for many the influence of religion on world affairs. And an influx of evangelical students at secular universities, along with an increasing number of international students, means students arrive with a broader array of religious experiences.
Professor Gomes (pronounced like “homes”) said a more diverse student body at Harvard had meant that “the place is more representative of mainstream America.”
This is happening at the same time that surveys across the country indicate college-age people are more open to accepting homosexuality and insuring full civil rights for them, such as same-sex marriage.
From where I sit, these two facts are not in conflict. Instead, I believe they show that college students are not just accepting right-wing religious rhetoric as fact--they are investigating and studying for themselves and developing their own values, ones which are more affirming and accepting than those of their elders.
All is not lost in a society when the younger generation is receiving MORE of God's revelation than those who preceeded them.
Peter J. Gomes has been at Harvard University for 37 years, and says he remembers when religious people on campus felt under siege. To be seen as religious often meant being dismissed as not very bright, he said.
No longer. At Harvard these days, said Professor Gomes, the university preacher, “There is probably more active religious life now than there has been in 100 years.”
Across the country, on secular campuses as varied as Colgate University, the University of Wisconsin and the University of California, Berkeley, chaplains, professors and administrators say students are drawn to religion and spirituality with more fervor than at any time they can remember.
University officials explained the surge of interest in religion as partly a result of the rise of the religious right in politics, which they said has made questions of faith more talked about generally. In addition, they said, the attacks of Sept. 11 underscored for many the influence of religion on world affairs. And an influx of evangelical students at secular universities, along with an increasing number of international students, means students arrive with a broader array of religious experiences.
Professor Gomes (pronounced like “homes”) said a more diverse student body at Harvard had meant that “the place is more representative of mainstream America.”
This is happening at the same time that surveys across the country indicate college-age people are more open to accepting homosexuality and insuring full civil rights for them, such as same-sex marriage.
From where I sit, these two facts are not in conflict. Instead, I believe they show that college students are not just accepting right-wing religious rhetoric as fact--they are investigating and studying for themselves and developing their own values, ones which are more affirming and accepting than those of their elders.
All is not lost in a society when the younger generation is receiving MORE of God's revelation than those who preceeded them.
Lack of Clarity Among Southern Baptists?
There is a spirited debate going on these days among Southern Baptists that does not involve homosexuality. There really isn't much debate within one of the largest religious denominations in the United States--Southern Baptist theology's view of homosexuality as a sin is very deeply entrenched and not really up for discussion.
According to this report from the Christian Post, however, the denomination does not have all the answers:
Southern Baptist pastors opened debate on speaking in tongues at a weekend conference where a charismatic Baptist sought to educate his fellow believers on the Holy Spirit.
After affirming his own conviction that he has been gifted with a private prayer language, Pastor Dwight McKissic of Cornerstone Baptist Church said Pentecost, and the Holy Spirit it celebrates, are largely overlooked in Baptist churches, according to the Associated Baptist Press. And the lack of awareness is a loss for Baptists, he added.
While the majority of Southern Baptist leaders do not practice or accept charismatic practices, Baptists are split on the issue and SBC president Frank Page also recognized and let stand the varying interpretations within the denomination.
"[B]ecause I do believe there are varying interpretations, I believe it is okay to believe one way or the other," said Page, months after the chapel sermon.
For the record, this gift of the Holy Spirit, the ability to speak/pray in tounges, is something I received a couple of years ago shortly after I joined Believers Covenant Fellowship. I was taught about it by Apostle Dale and Pastor Brenda. It was an adjustment for me since I had never experienced it. The first time Pastor Brenda took me to church and used her prayer language (with no warning), I almost wet my pants. It's a gift that most of our congregation has and uses as part of their worship.
"Two people using the same methods of interpretation can look at the same text and come to completely opposite conclusions. When someone says, 'I'm speaking in tongues and it is from the Holy Spirit,' some people believe them and other people don't, and there's the difference," said Bart Barber of First Baptist Church of Farmersville, Texas, as he presented the semi-cessationist viewpoint (belief that some of the gifts of the Holy Spirit ceased with the early church), according to Baptist Press.
It's okay for people to interpret biblical text differently and neither one of them becoming a heretic or heathen? Stop the presses for that news flash coming from a Southern Baptist speaker.
Now if only they would open their minds a little farther and reconsider the "clobber passages" they have been abusing GLBT people with for so long.
According to this report from the Christian Post, however, the denomination does not have all the answers:
Southern Baptist pastors opened debate on speaking in tongues at a weekend conference where a charismatic Baptist sought to educate his fellow believers on the Holy Spirit.
After affirming his own conviction that he has been gifted with a private prayer language, Pastor Dwight McKissic of Cornerstone Baptist Church said Pentecost, and the Holy Spirit it celebrates, are largely overlooked in Baptist churches, according to the Associated Baptist Press. And the lack of awareness is a loss for Baptists, he added.
While the majority of Southern Baptist leaders do not practice or accept charismatic practices, Baptists are split on the issue and SBC president Frank Page also recognized and let stand the varying interpretations within the denomination.
"[B]ecause I do believe there are varying interpretations, I believe it is okay to believe one way or the other," said Page, months after the chapel sermon.
For the record, this gift of the Holy Spirit, the ability to speak/pray in tounges, is something I received a couple of years ago shortly after I joined Believers Covenant Fellowship. I was taught about it by Apostle Dale and Pastor Brenda. It was an adjustment for me since I had never experienced it. The first time Pastor Brenda took me to church and used her prayer language (with no warning), I almost wet my pants. It's a gift that most of our congregation has and uses as part of their worship.
"Two people using the same methods of interpretation can look at the same text and come to completely opposite conclusions. When someone says, 'I'm speaking in tongues and it is from the Holy Spirit,' some people believe them and other people don't, and there's the difference," said Bart Barber of First Baptist Church of Farmersville, Texas, as he presented the semi-cessationist viewpoint (belief that some of the gifts of the Holy Spirit ceased with the early church), according to Baptist Press.
It's okay for people to interpret biblical text differently and neither one of them becoming a heretic or heathen? Stop the presses for that news flash coming from a Southern Baptist speaker.
Now if only they would open their minds a little farther and reconsider the "clobber passages" they have been abusing GLBT people with for so long.
May 01, 2007
"Pastors spread the word on AIDS"
If you've even casually read the New Testament in the Bible, especially the Gospels, you've seen a LOT of references (including Jesus' direct ministry) to helping the poor and the sick.
So why, then, don't more churches focus on helping people with AIDS? Unfortunately, most of that is tied in with prejudice, even bigotry, against the GLBT people who are impacted by this disease. There are even people who stand behind a pulpit who still believe that AIDS is God's punishment to homosexuals, and I suspect a lot more ministers believe it than actually have the nerve (or gall) to say so.
That's why this article from the Chicago Tribune is refreshing. Last Sunday, messages about reaching out and helping people with AIDS were preached from over 100 largely African-American churches in the Chicago area. Given the startling statistics that nearly half of new AIDS cases in the United States affected African-Americans, who represent about 13% of the population, there is no better place to focus on emphasizing this message.
Rev. Charles Jenkins from the Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church on Chicago's South Side led this effort:
"The church is that place to be empowered and encouraged," he said.
"Jesus wasn't just concerned about people spiritually," Jenkins said. "He was concerned about people physically too, and emotionally."
"Jesus didn't move away. He moved in when people were dealing with all kinds of circumstances."
May God bless the efforts of Rev. Jenkins and others like him. Please join me in praying that people will listen.....and act.
So why, then, don't more churches focus on helping people with AIDS? Unfortunately, most of that is tied in with prejudice, even bigotry, against the GLBT people who are impacted by this disease. There are even people who stand behind a pulpit who still believe that AIDS is God's punishment to homosexuals, and I suspect a lot more ministers believe it than actually have the nerve (or gall) to say so.
That's why this article from the Chicago Tribune is refreshing. Last Sunday, messages about reaching out and helping people with AIDS were preached from over 100 largely African-American churches in the Chicago area. Given the startling statistics that nearly half of new AIDS cases in the United States affected African-Americans, who represent about 13% of the population, there is no better place to focus on emphasizing this message.
Rev. Charles Jenkins from the Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church on Chicago's South Side led this effort:
"The church is that place to be empowered and encouraged," he said.
"Jesus wasn't just concerned about people spiritually," Jenkins said. "He was concerned about people physically too, and emotionally."
"Jesus didn't move away. He moved in when people were dealing with all kinds of circumstances."
May God bless the efforts of Rev. Jenkins and others like him. Please join me in praying that people will listen.....and act.
Former AFA Staffer on How AFA is Using Hate to Fight Hate Crimes Bill
Joe Murray, who used to write some of the right-wing propaganda for the American (Straight) Family Association continues to speak out against the organization, particularly the tactics they use to try and get their way. Murray has most recently written about their campaign against the Matthew Sheppard Bill (the pending Hate Crimes legislation being considered by Congress).
First, Murray speaks out about the despicable Tony Perkins, head of the (Straight) Family Research Council:
"Under this legislation, the crimes at Virginia Tech, which some are calling one of the deadliest rampages in U.S. history, would not be punishable to the level of these so-called 'hate-crimes'," wrote Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council (FRC), in an email alert sent out to FRC supporters. Perkins' analysis, however, was far from over.
Explaining why the hate crimes bill is not good for America, Perkins wrote, "If the House approves H.R. 1592 and the Senate follows, a homosexual would have more federal protection under the law than the 32 victims of last week's massacre."
Words cannot describe how disheartening such a comment, from a man who champions the values of Christianity, is.
While parents, siblings, students and staff mourned the senseless killings of 32 members of the Virginia Tech community, Perkins thought it was an opportune time, and perhaps even an exercise of his Christian duty, to exploit the tragic situation to aid in the manufacturing of a "homosexual agenda." This is not only degrading to Virginia Tech and to the gay community, it clearly prostitutes any notion of family values.
Murray then speaks out against the AFA's approach:
Make no mistake - Christians, blacks and a handful of other groups already enjoy hate crime protection under a 1968 federal civil rights law. All homosexuals are asking is that they be included. If one wants to be against hate crime legislation on the principle that all crimes are motivated by hate, so be it. But one cannot lobby against hate crimes while one enjoys the benefit he is seeking to deny to others. This is the height of hubris.
This debate, though, is not a principled debate on the legitimacy of hate crimes; it is a debate that seeks to pit gays against Christians. It is a debate that seeks to separate, not unite, a debate that seeks to deny truth with tension. For proof, look no further than the American Family Association (AFA).
"Let's face it," wrote AFA founder Don Wildmon in an email, "homosexual and transgender activists know full well that the church is one of last bastions in Western culture that has yet to cave in to the demands of a radical agenda that seeks to redefine fundamental concepts such as marriage, family and gender." There you have it - no middle ground can be had and a scorched earth policy must proceed against the gays to protect Christendom.
Is this what Jesus would do? Nobody knows for sure, but one would think that Christ's name is more in line with an olive branch rather than a billy club.
It's nice to have Mr. Murray on our side of this and other important issues.
Thanks to Good As You for the tip.
First, Murray speaks out about the despicable Tony Perkins, head of the (Straight) Family Research Council:
"Under this legislation, the crimes at Virginia Tech, which some are calling one of the deadliest rampages in U.S. history, would not be punishable to the level of these so-called 'hate-crimes'," wrote Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council (FRC), in an email alert sent out to FRC supporters. Perkins' analysis, however, was far from over.
Explaining why the hate crimes bill is not good for America, Perkins wrote, "If the House approves H.R. 1592 and the Senate follows, a homosexual would have more federal protection under the law than the 32 victims of last week's massacre."
Words cannot describe how disheartening such a comment, from a man who champions the values of Christianity, is.
While parents, siblings, students and staff mourned the senseless killings of 32 members of the Virginia Tech community, Perkins thought it was an opportune time, and perhaps even an exercise of his Christian duty, to exploit the tragic situation to aid in the manufacturing of a "homosexual agenda." This is not only degrading to Virginia Tech and to the gay community, it clearly prostitutes any notion of family values.
Murray then speaks out against the AFA's approach:
Make no mistake - Christians, blacks and a handful of other groups already enjoy hate crime protection under a 1968 federal civil rights law. All homosexuals are asking is that they be included. If one wants to be against hate crime legislation on the principle that all crimes are motivated by hate, so be it. But one cannot lobby against hate crimes while one enjoys the benefit he is seeking to deny to others. This is the height of hubris.
This debate, though, is not a principled debate on the legitimacy of hate crimes; it is a debate that seeks to pit gays against Christians. It is a debate that seeks to separate, not unite, a debate that seeks to deny truth with tension. For proof, look no further than the American Family Association (AFA).
"Let's face it," wrote AFA founder Don Wildmon in an email, "homosexual and transgender activists know full well that the church is one of last bastions in Western culture that has yet to cave in to the demands of a radical agenda that seeks to redefine fundamental concepts such as marriage, family and gender." There you have it - no middle ground can be had and a scorched earth policy must proceed against the gays to protect Christendom.
Is this what Jesus would do? Nobody knows for sure, but one would think that Christ's name is more in line with an olive branch rather than a billy club.
It's nice to have Mr. Murray on our side of this and other important issues.
Thanks to Good As You for the tip.
April 30, 2007
New York State Becomes Next Marriage Battleground
As he promised during his election campaign, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer has introduced legislation that would give same-sex couples full marriage rights in the state.
According to the report in New York's Gay City News, analyists believe the legislation has a good chance of passing the Democratic controlled Assembly, but getting it through the Republican-led Senate will be a much tougher challenge. An ally in that fight could be New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is on record as committing to testify in favor of this type of legislation.
I commend Governor Spitzer for backing up his campaign promise with action, something that is becoming more of a rare occurrence in this nation's political arena,
One of the right-wing's favorite arguements against same-sex marriage is that the majority of people don't want it. That appears not to be the case in New York according to this survey taken by Crain's Business. Published in Crain's New York Business magazine, the poll showed that 63% of voters support a gay marriage law.
I wonder how the right wing will react if they lose this battle in the New York state legislature. Wouldn't it be interesting if they took the issue to court? That wouldn't surprise me and would serve to reinforce my view that hypocrisy is no obstacle as long as they succeed in restricting the rights of GLBT people and recording their bigotry in the laws of this nation.
According to the report in New York's Gay City News, analyists believe the legislation has a good chance of passing the Democratic controlled Assembly, but getting it through the Republican-led Senate will be a much tougher challenge. An ally in that fight could be New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is on record as committing to testify in favor of this type of legislation.
I commend Governor Spitzer for backing up his campaign promise with action, something that is becoming more of a rare occurrence in this nation's political arena,
One of the right-wing's favorite arguements against same-sex marriage is that the majority of people don't want it. That appears not to be the case in New York according to this survey taken by Crain's Business. Published in Crain's New York Business magazine, the poll showed that 63% of voters support a gay marriage law.
I wonder how the right wing will react if they lose this battle in the New York state legislature. Wouldn't it be interesting if they took the issue to court? That wouldn't surprise me and would serve to reinforce my view that hypocrisy is no obstacle as long as they succeed in restricting the rights of GLBT people and recording their bigotry in the laws of this nation.
Do GLBT Celeberties Have a Greater Responsibility?
Are they obligated to come out? That's an interesting question posed in this blog post by Kevin Naff, the editor of the Washington Blade.
The obligation is not to hold pinkies, it’s merely to be honest about who you are. And what straight celebrity feels the need to keep their sexual orientation a “mystery”? From Paris Hilton and Pamela Anderson, whose videotaped sexual romps were released for mass consumption, to Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, whose divorce generated headlines for months, the personal lives of straight celebrities are on full view. You can debate whether or not that’s a good thing, but it’s reality. And the standards should be the same for gays.
If Alec Baldwin’s private voicemails to his daughter are fodder for mainstream news coverage, then other gay celebrities should at least be able to answer truthfully whether or not they are gay.
The issue received renewed attention thanks to Out magazine’s deliciously brilliant May cover that features the faces of CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and actress Jodie Foster to illustrate a story about the “glass closet.” The magazine also named the ambiguous duo on its list of the 50 most powerful gays.
My colleague, Chris Ciompi, editor of Genre magazine, which is affiliated with the Blade, denounced the Out cover in an interview with the New York Daily News.
"Your right to privacy is a constitutional right," Ciompi said. "Maybe Jodie and Anderson would prefer to be known for their work, not their sexuality. The climate of the United States today still would not allow that to occur. With Anderson, many people would perceive his credibility to be undermined."
The problem with Ciompi’s reasoning is that straight celebrities don’t have the option to be “known for their work,” and the rules should be the same for their gay counterparts. And how does being gay undermine your credibility as a journalist? Cooper has cited that offensive canard in refusing to answer questions about his sexual orientation and the gay media ought not give him cover. As for privacy rights, there are far different legal standards of privacy for public figures. Just ask Alec Baldwin.
I agree with Naff up to a point. Anyone who is marketing themselves as something they are not (which includes a GLBT person passing themselves off as straight) should be held to a standard of at least being honest about who they really are.
Where I part ways with Naff is that you can hardly say straight celeberties are held to that standard. Yes, as he points out, they can flaunt a heterosexual lifestyle and no one even blinks, but sexual orientation is only part of who a person really is. It would be quite a reach to say that the general public has much true insight into the type of people Paris Hilton or Alec Baldwin truly are.
Therefore, if a celeberty is disengenous about his or her sexual orientation, it's hard for me to say that is much if any worse than the difference between image and reality many straight celebs work hard to maintain. I'm not sure at all that GLBT celeberties should be held to a higher standard.
What do you think?
The obligation is not to hold pinkies, it’s merely to be honest about who you are. And what straight celebrity feels the need to keep their sexual orientation a “mystery”? From Paris Hilton and Pamela Anderson, whose videotaped sexual romps were released for mass consumption, to Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, whose divorce generated headlines for months, the personal lives of straight celebrities are on full view. You can debate whether or not that’s a good thing, but it’s reality. And the standards should be the same for gays.
If Alec Baldwin’s private voicemails to his daughter are fodder for mainstream news coverage, then other gay celebrities should at least be able to answer truthfully whether or not they are gay.
The issue received renewed attention thanks to Out magazine’s deliciously brilliant May cover that features the faces of CNN anchor Anderson Cooper and actress Jodie Foster to illustrate a story about the “glass closet.” The magazine also named the ambiguous duo on its list of the 50 most powerful gays.
My colleague, Chris Ciompi, editor of Genre magazine, which is affiliated with the Blade, denounced the Out cover in an interview with the New York Daily News.
"Your right to privacy is a constitutional right," Ciompi said. "Maybe Jodie and Anderson would prefer to be known for their work, not their sexuality. The climate of the United States today still would not allow that to occur. With Anderson, many people would perceive his credibility to be undermined."
The problem with Ciompi’s reasoning is that straight celebrities don’t have the option to be “known for their work,” and the rules should be the same for their gay counterparts. And how does being gay undermine your credibility as a journalist? Cooper has cited that offensive canard in refusing to answer questions about his sexual orientation and the gay media ought not give him cover. As for privacy rights, there are far different legal standards of privacy for public figures. Just ask Alec Baldwin.
I agree with Naff up to a point. Anyone who is marketing themselves as something they are not (which includes a GLBT person passing themselves off as straight) should be held to a standard of at least being honest about who they really are.
Where I part ways with Naff is that you can hardly say straight celeberties are held to that standard. Yes, as he points out, they can flaunt a heterosexual lifestyle and no one even blinks, but sexual orientation is only part of who a person really is. It would be quite a reach to say that the general public has much true insight into the type of people Paris Hilton or Alec Baldwin truly are.
Therefore, if a celeberty is disengenous about his or her sexual orientation, it's hard for me to say that is much if any worse than the difference between image and reality many straight celebs work hard to maintain. I'm not sure at all that GLBT celeberties should be held to a higher standard.
What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
